Merge branch 'bpf-introduce-may_goto-and-cond_break'

Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
bpf: Introduce may_goto and cond_break

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

v5 -> v6:
- Rename BPF_JMA to BPF_JCOND
- Addressed Andrii's review comments

v4 -> v5:
- rewrote patch 1 to avoid fake may_goto_reg and use 'u32 may_goto_cnt' instead.
  This way may_goto handling is similar to bpf_loop() processing.
- fixed bug in patch 2 that RANGE_WITHIN should not use
  rold->type == NOT_INIT as a safe signal.
- patch 3 fixed negative offset computation in cond_break macro
- using bpf_arena and cond_break recompiled lib/glob.c as bpf prog
  and it works! It will be added as a selftest to arena series.

v3 -> v4:
- fix drained issue reported by John.
  may_goto insn could be implemented with sticky state (once
  reaches 0 it stays 0), but the verifier shouldn't assume that.
  It has to explore both branches.
  Arguably drained iterator state shouldn't be there at all.
  bpf_iter_css_next() is not sticky. Can be fixed, but auditing all
  iterators for stickiness. That's an orthogonal discussion.
- explained JMA name reasons in patch 1
- fixed test_progs-no_alu32 issue and added another test

v2 -> v3: Major change
- drop bpf_can_loop() kfunc and introduce may_goto instruction instead
  kfunc is a function call while may_goto doesn't consume any registers
  and LLVM can produce much better code due to less register pressure.
- instead of counting from zero to BPF_MAX_LOOPS start from it instead
  and break out of the loop when count reaches zero
- use may_goto instruction in cond_break macro
- recognize that 'exact' state comparison doesn't need to be truly exact.
  regsafe() should ignore precision and liveness marks, but range_within
  logic is safe to use while evaluating open coded iterators.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240306031929.42666-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Author: anakryiko

include/linux/bpf_verifier.h

@@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state {
 	u32 jmp_history_cnt;
 	u32 dfs_depth;
 	u32 callback_unroll_depth;
+	u32 may_goto_depth;
 };
 
 #define bpf_get_spilled_reg(slot, frame, mask)				\
@@ -619,6 +620,7 @@ struct bpf_subprog_info {
 	u32 start; /* insn idx of function entry point */
 	u32 linfo_idx; /* The idx to the main_prog->aux->linfo */
 	u16 stack_depth; /* max. stack depth used by this function */
+	u16 stack_extra;
 	bool has_tail_call: 1;
 	bool tail_call_reachable: 1;
 	bool has_ld_abs: 1;

include/uapi/linux/bpf.h

@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #define BPF_JSGE	0x70	/* SGE is signed '>=', GE in x86 */
 #define BPF_JSLT	0xc0	/* SLT is signed, '<' */
 #define BPF_JSLE	0xd0	/* SLE is signed, '<=' */
+#define BPF_JCOND	0xe0	/* conditional pseudo jumps: may_goto, goto_or_nop */
 #define BPF_CALL	0x80	/* function call */
 #define BPF_EXIT	0x90	/* function return */
 
@@ -50,6 +51,10 @@
 #define BPF_XCHG	(0xe0 | BPF_FETCH)	/* atomic exchange */
 #define BPF_CMPXCHG	(0xf0 | BPF_FETCH)	/* atomic compare-and-write */
 
+enum bpf_cond_pseudo_jmp {
+	BPF_MAY_GOTO = 0,
+};
+
 /* Register numbers */
 enum {
 	BPF_REG_0 = 0,

kernel/bpf/core.c

@@ -1675,6 +1675,7 @@ bool bpf_opcode_in_insntable(u8 code)
 		[BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_B] = true,
 		[BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_H] = true,
 		[BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_W] = true,
+		[BPF_JMP | BPF_JCOND] = true,
 	};
 #undef BPF_INSN_3_TBL
 #undef BPF_INSN_2_TBL

kernel/bpf/disasm.c

@@ -322,6 +322,10 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
 		} else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_JA)) {
 			verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) goto pc%+d\n",
 				insn->code, insn->off);
+		} else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_JCOND) &&
+			   insn->src_reg == BPF_MAY_GOTO) {
+			verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) may_goto pc%+d\n",
+				insn->code, insn->off);
 		} else if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA)) {
 			verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) gotol pc%+d\n",
 				insn->code, insn->imm);