Merge branch 'virtio-vsock-fix-memory-leaks'

Michal Luczaj says:

====================
virtio/vsock: Fix memory leaks

Short series fixing some memory leaks that I've stumbled upon while toying
with the selftests.

Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241107-vsock-mem-leaks-v2-0-4e21bfcfc818@rbox.co
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

Author: Paolo Abeni

net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c

@@ -836,6 +836,9 @@ static void vsock_sk_destruct(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
 
+	/* Flush MSG_ZEROCOPY leftovers. */
+	__skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_error_queue);
+
 	vsock_deassign_transport(vsk);
 
 	/* When clearing these addresses, there's no need to set the family and

net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c

@@ -400,6 +400,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 			if (virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb(vsk, skb,
 							    info->msg,
 							    can_zcopy)) {
+				kfree_skb(skb);
 				ret = -ENOMEM;
 				break;
 			}
@@ -1512,6 +1513,14 @@ virtio_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
+	/* __vsock_release() might have already flushed accept_queue.
+	 * Subsequent enqueues would lead to a memory leak.
+	 */
+	if (sk->sk_shutdown == SHUTDOWN_MASK) {
+		virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb);
+		return -ESHUTDOWN;
+	}
+
 	child = vsock_create_connected(sk);
 	if (!child) {
 		virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb);