|
5 | 5 | #include <crypto/sha2.h> |
6 | 6 | #include "sha256-testvecs.h" |
7 | 7 |
|
| 8 | +/* Generate the HASH_KUNIT_CASES using hash-test-template.h. */ |
8 | 9 | #define HASH sha256 |
9 | 10 | #define HASH_CTX sha256_ctx |
10 | 11 | #define HASH_SIZE SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE |
|
21 | 22 | #define HMAC_USINGRAWKEY hmac_sha256_usingrawkey |
22 | 23 | #include "hash-test-template.h" |
23 | 24 |
|
| 25 | +static void free_guarded_buf(void *buf) |
| 26 | +{ |
| 27 | + vfree(buf); |
| 28 | +} |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +/* |
| 31 | + * Allocate a KUnit-managed buffer that has length @len bytes immediately |
| 32 | + * followed by an unmapped page, and assert that the allocation succeeds. |
| 33 | + */ |
| 34 | +static void *alloc_guarded_buf(struct kunit *test, size_t len) |
| 35 | +{ |
| 36 | + size_t full_len = round_up(len, PAGE_SIZE); |
| 37 | + void *buf = vmalloc(full_len); |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf); |
| 40 | + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, |
| 41 | + kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, free_guarded_buf, buf)); |
| 42 | + return buf + full_len - len; |
| 43 | +} |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +/* |
| 46 | + * Test for sha256_finup_2x(). Specifically, choose various data lengths and |
| 47 | + * salt lengths, and for each one, verify that sha256_finup_2x() produces the |
| 48 | + * same results as sha256_update() and sha256_final(). |
| 49 | + * |
| 50 | + * Use guarded buffers for all inputs and outputs to reliably detect any |
| 51 | + * out-of-bounds reads or writes, even if they occur in assembly code. |
| 52 | + */ |
| 53 | +static void test_sha256_finup_2x(struct kunit *test) |
| 54 | +{ |
| 55 | + const size_t max_data_len = 16384; |
| 56 | + u8 *data1_buf, *data2_buf, *hash1, *hash2; |
| 57 | + u8 expected_hash1[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 58 | + u8 expected_hash2[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 59 | + u8 salt[SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE]; |
| 60 | + struct sha256_ctx *ctx; |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | + data1_buf = alloc_guarded_buf(test, max_data_len); |
| 63 | + data2_buf = alloc_guarded_buf(test, max_data_len); |
| 64 | + hash1 = alloc_guarded_buf(test, SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE); |
| 65 | + hash2 = alloc_guarded_buf(test, SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE); |
| 66 | + ctx = alloc_guarded_buf(test, sizeof(*ctx)); |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | + rand_bytes(data1_buf, max_data_len); |
| 69 | + rand_bytes(data2_buf, max_data_len); |
| 70 | + rand_bytes(salt, sizeof(salt)); |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | + for (size_t i = 0; i < 500; i++) { |
| 73 | + size_t salt_len = rand_length(sizeof(salt)); |
| 74 | + size_t data_len = rand_length(max_data_len); |
| 75 | + const u8 *data1 = data1_buf + max_data_len - data_len; |
| 76 | + const u8 *data2 = data2_buf + max_data_len - data_len; |
| 77 | + struct sha256_ctx orig_ctx; |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | + sha256_init(ctx); |
| 80 | + sha256_update(ctx, salt, salt_len); |
| 81 | + orig_ctx = *ctx; |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | + sha256_finup_2x(ctx, data1, data2, data_len, hash1, hash2); |
| 84 | + KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG( |
| 85 | + test, ctx, &orig_ctx, sizeof(*ctx), |
| 86 | + "sha256_finup_2x() modified its ctx argument"); |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | + sha256_update(ctx, data1, data_len); |
| 89 | + sha256_final(ctx, expected_hash1); |
| 90 | + sha256_update(&orig_ctx, data2, data_len); |
| 91 | + sha256_final(&orig_ctx, expected_hash2); |
| 92 | + KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG( |
| 93 | + test, hash1, expected_hash1, SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE, |
| 94 | + "Wrong hash1 with salt_len=%zu data_len=%zu", salt_len, |
| 95 | + data_len); |
| 96 | + KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ_MSG( |
| 97 | + test, hash2, expected_hash2, SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE, |
| 98 | + "Wrong hash2 with salt_len=%zu data_len=%zu", salt_len, |
| 99 | + data_len); |
| 100 | + } |
| 101 | +} |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +/* Test sha256_finup_2x() with ctx == NULL */ |
| 104 | +static void test_sha256_finup_2x_defaultctx(struct kunit *test) |
| 105 | +{ |
| 106 | + const size_t data_len = 128; |
| 107 | + struct sha256_ctx ctx; |
| 108 | + u8 hash1_a[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 109 | + u8 hash2_a[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 110 | + u8 hash1_b[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 111 | + u8 hash2_b[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | + rand_bytes(test_buf, 2 * data_len); |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | + sha256_init(&ctx); |
| 116 | + sha256_finup_2x(&ctx, test_buf, &test_buf[data_len], data_len, hash1_a, |
| 117 | + hash2_a); |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | + sha256_finup_2x(NULL, test_buf, &test_buf[data_len], data_len, hash1_b, |
| 120 | + hash2_b); |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | + KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ(test, hash1_a, hash1_b, SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE); |
| 123 | + KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ(test, hash2_a, hash2_b, SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE); |
| 124 | +} |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +/* |
| 127 | + * Test that sha256_finup_2x() and sha256_update/final() produce consistent |
| 128 | + * results with total message lengths that require more than 32 bits. |
| 129 | + */ |
| 130 | +static void test_sha256_finup_2x_hugelen(struct kunit *test) |
| 131 | +{ |
| 132 | + const size_t data_len = 4 * SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE; |
| 133 | + struct sha256_ctx ctx = {}; |
| 134 | + u8 expected_hash[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 135 | + u8 hash[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | + rand_bytes(test_buf, data_len); |
| 138 | + for (size_t align = 0; align < SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE; align++) { |
| 139 | + sha256_init(&ctx); |
| 140 | + ctx.ctx.bytecount = 0x123456789abcd00 + align; |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | + sha256_finup_2x(&ctx, test_buf, test_buf, data_len, hash, hash); |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | + sha256_update(&ctx, test_buf, data_len); |
| 145 | + sha256_final(&ctx, expected_hash); |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | + KUNIT_ASSERT_MEMEQ(test, hash, expected_hash, |
| 148 | + SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE); |
| 149 | + } |
| 150 | +} |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +/* Benchmark for sha256_finup_2x() */ |
| 153 | +static void benchmark_sha256_finup_2x(struct kunit *test) |
| 154 | +{ |
| 155 | + /* |
| 156 | + * Try a few different salt lengths, since sha256_finup_2x() performance |
| 157 | + * may vary slightly for the same data_len depending on how many bytes |
| 158 | + * were already processed in the initial context. |
| 159 | + */ |
| 160 | + static const size_t salt_lens_to_test[] = { 0, 32, 64 }; |
| 161 | + const size_t data_len = 4096; |
| 162 | + const size_t num_iters = 4096; |
| 163 | + struct sha256_ctx ctx; |
| 164 | + u8 hash1[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 165 | + u8 hash2[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE]; |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_BENCHMARK)) |
| 168 | + kunit_skip(test, "not enabled"); |
| 169 | + if (!sha256_finup_2x_is_optimized()) |
| 170 | + kunit_skip(test, "not relevant"); |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | + rand_bytes(test_buf, data_len * 2); |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | + /* Warm-up */ |
| 175 | + for (size_t i = 0; i < num_iters; i++) |
| 176 | + sha256_finup_2x(NULL, &test_buf[0], &test_buf[data_len], |
| 177 | + data_len, hash1, hash2); |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | + for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(salt_lens_to_test); i++) { |
| 180 | + size_t salt_len = salt_lens_to_test[i]; |
| 181 | + u64 t0, t1; |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | + /* |
| 184 | + * Prepare the initial context. The time to process the salt is |
| 185 | + * not measured; we're just interested in sha256_finup_2x(). |
| 186 | + */ |
| 187 | + sha256_init(&ctx); |
| 188 | + sha256_update(&ctx, test_buf, salt_len); |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | + preempt_disable(); |
| 191 | + t0 = ktime_get_ns(); |
| 192 | + for (size_t j = 0; j < num_iters; j++) |
| 193 | + sha256_finup_2x(&ctx, &test_buf[0], &test_buf[data_len], |
| 194 | + data_len, hash1, hash2); |
| 195 | + t1 = ktime_get_ns(); |
| 196 | + preempt_enable(); |
| 197 | + kunit_info(test, "data_len=%zu salt_len=%zu: %llu MB/s", |
| 198 | + data_len, salt_len, |
| 199 | + div64_u64((u64)data_len * 2 * num_iters * 1000, |
| 200 | + t1 - t0 ?: 1)); |
| 201 | + } |
| 202 | +} |
| 203 | + |
24 | 204 | static struct kunit_case hash_test_cases[] = { |
25 | 205 | HASH_KUNIT_CASES, |
| 206 | + KUNIT_CASE(test_sha256_finup_2x), |
| 207 | + KUNIT_CASE(test_sha256_finup_2x_defaultctx), |
| 208 | + KUNIT_CASE(test_sha256_finup_2x_hugelen), |
26 | 209 | KUNIT_CASE(benchmark_hash), |
| 210 | + KUNIT_CASE(benchmark_sha256_finup_2x), |
27 | 211 | {}, |
28 | 212 | }; |
29 | 213 |
|
|
0 commit comments