Commit 9465f44
sched_ext: Documentation: Clarify time slice handling in task lifecycle
It is not always obvious how a task's time slice can be refilled, either
explicitly from ops.dispatch() or automatically by the sched_ext core,
to skip subsequent ops.enqueue() and ops.dispatch() calls. This
typically happens when the task is the only one running on a CPU.
To make this behavior easier to understand, update the task lifecycle
diagram to explicitly document how time slice handling works in such
cases.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>1 parent 086ed90 commit 9465f44
1 file changed
Lines changed: 8 additions & 3 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
313 | 313 | | |
314 | 314 | | |
315 | 315 | | |
316 | | - | |
| 316 | + | |
317 | 317 | | |
318 | 318 | | |
319 | | - | |
| 319 | + | |
320 | 320 | | |
321 | 321 | | |
322 | 322 | | |
323 | 323 | | |
324 | | - | |
| 324 | + | |
| 325 | + | |
325 | 326 | | |
| 327 | + | |
| 328 | + | |
| 329 | + | |
| 330 | + | |
326 | 331 | | |
327 | 332 | | |
328 | 333 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments