Skip to content

Question: would incident-derived non-formation fixtures be useful as ASI companion tests? #17

Description

@visker83-del

Hello ASI maintainers,

We released AECP v0.1-rc2, a small incident-derived conformance profile for agent effect control.

AECP is implementation-neutral within a portable exact-qualification adapter profile. It is not a universal benchmark for every monitor, sandbox, or authorization model, and it does not prescribe a Certum mechanism or propose another risk taxonomy.

The profile provides harmless local fixtures, matched negative and positive controls, and independent protected-surface probes. Its core distinction is that a policy rejection is not evidence that the protected effect path stayed absent.

Repository and release:
https://github.com/visker83-del/aecp
https://github.com/visker83-del/aecp/releases/tag/v0.1-rc2

We would value guidance on whether this is useful as:

  • a standalone community test profile;
  • companion fixtures for an ASI or AISVS mapping;
  • or not a fit for this project.

The most useful feedback would be a missing effect path, unsupported assumption, or counterexample. If issues are the wrong venue, please point us to the appropriate ASI channel.

Best,
Jungsoo Baek
Founder, Certum Systems

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions