fs: push list presence check into inode_io_list_del()

For consistency with sb routines.

ext4 is the only consumer outside of evict(). Damage-controlling it is
outside of the scope of this cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103230911.516866-1-mjguzik@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

Author: mjguzik

fs/ext4/inode.c

@@ -202,8 +202,7 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	 * the inode. Flush worker is ignoring it because of I_FREEING flag but
 	 * we still need to remove the inode from the writeback lists.
 	 */
-	if (!list_empty_careful(&inode->i_io_list))
-		inode_io_list_del(inode);
+	inode_io_list_del(inode);
 
 	/*
 	 * Protect us against freezing - iput() caller didn't have to have any

fs/fs-writeback.c

@@ -1349,6 +1349,13 @@ void inode_io_list_del(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	struct bdi_writeback *wb;
 
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: ext4 can call here from ext4_evict_inode() after evict() already
+	 * unlinked the inode.
+	 */
+	if (list_empty_careful(&inode->i_io_list))
+		return;
+
 	wb = inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode);
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 

fs/inode.c

@@ -818,9 +818,7 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode)
 	BUG_ON(!(inode_state_read_once(inode) & I_FREEING));
 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode->i_lru));
 
-	if (!list_empty(&inode->i_io_list))
-		inode_io_list_del(inode);
-
+	inode_io_list_del(inode);
 	inode_sb_list_del(inode);
 
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);