|
5 | 5 |
|
6 | 6 | static struct callback_head work_exited; /* all we need is ->next == NULL */ |
7 | 7 |
|
8 | | -/* |
9 | | - * TWA_SIGNAL signaling - use TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL, if available, as it's faster |
10 | | - * than TIF_SIGPENDING as there's no dependency on ->sighand. The latter is |
11 | | - * shared for threads, and can cause contention on sighand->lock. Even for |
12 | | - * the non-threaded case TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is more efficient, as no locking |
13 | | - * or IRQ disabling is involved for notification (or running) purposes. |
14 | | - */ |
15 | | -static void task_work_notify_signal(struct task_struct *task) |
16 | | -{ |
17 | | -#if defined(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) |
18 | | - set_notify_signal(task); |
19 | | -#else |
20 | | - unsigned long flags; |
21 | | - |
22 | | - /* |
23 | | - * Only grab the sighand lock if we don't already have some |
24 | | - * task_work pending. This pairs with the smp_store_mb() |
25 | | - * in get_signal(), see comment there. |
26 | | - */ |
27 | | - if (!(READ_ONCE(task->jobctl) & JOBCTL_TASK_WORK) && |
28 | | - lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) { |
29 | | - task->jobctl |= JOBCTL_TASK_WORK; |
30 | | - signal_wake_up(task, 0); |
31 | | - unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags); |
32 | | - } |
33 | | -#endif |
34 | | -} |
35 | | - |
36 | 8 | /** |
37 | 9 | * task_work_add - ask the @task to execute @work->func() |
38 | 10 | * @task: the task which should run the callback |
@@ -76,7 +48,7 @@ int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work, |
76 | 48 | set_notify_resume(task); |
77 | 49 | break; |
78 | 50 | case TWA_SIGNAL: |
79 | | - task_work_notify_signal(task); |
| 51 | + set_notify_signal(task); |
80 | 52 | break; |
81 | 53 | default: |
82 | 54 | WARN_ON_ONCE(1); |
|
0 commit comments