xfrm: skip templates check for packet offload tunnel mode

In packet offload, hardware is responsible to check templates. The
result of its operation is forwarded through secpath by relevant
drivers. That secpath is actually removed in __xfrm_policy_check2().

In case packet is forwarded, this secpath is reset in RX, but pushed
again to TX where policy is rechecked again against dummy secpath
in xfrm_policy_ok().

Such situation causes to unexpected XfrmInTmplMismatch increase.

As a solution, simply skip template mismatch check.

Fixes: 600258d ("xfrm: delete intermediate secpath entry in packet offload mode")
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>

Author: rleon

net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c

@@ -3801,8 +3801,8 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		struct xfrm_tmpl *tp[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH];
 		struct xfrm_tmpl *stp[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH];
 		struct xfrm_tmpl **tpp = tp;
+		int i, k = 0;
 		int ti = 0;
-		int i, k;
 
 		sp = skb_sec_path(skb);
 		if (!sp)
@@ -3828,6 +3828,12 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			tpp = stp;
 		}
 
+		if (pol->xdo.type == XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_PACKET && sp == &dummy)
+			/* This policy template was already checked by HW
+			 * and secpath was removed in __xfrm_policy_check2.
+			 */
+			goto out;
+
 		/* For each tunnel xfrm, find the first matching tmpl.
 		 * For each tmpl before that, find corresponding xfrm.
 		 * Order is _important_. Later we will implement
@@ -3837,7 +3843,7 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		 * verified to allow them to be skipped in future policy
 		 * checks (e.g. nested tunnels).
 		 */
-		for (i = xfrm_nr-1, k = 0; i >= 0; i--) {
+		for (i = xfrm_nr - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
 			k = xfrm_policy_ok(tpp[i], sp, k, family, if_id);
 			if (k < 0) {
 				if (k < -1)
@@ -3853,6 +3859,7 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			goto reject;
 		}
 
+out:
 		xfrm_pols_put(pols, npols);
 		sp->verified_cnt = k;