Commit 1391b9c
drm/i915/guc: ADL-N should use the same GuC FW as ADL-S
The only difference between the ADL S and P GuC FWs is the HWConfig
support. ADL-N does not support HWConfig, so we should use the same
binary as ADL-S, otherwise the GuC might attempt to fetch a config
table that does not exist. ADL-N is internally identified as an ADL-P,
so we need to special-case it in the FW selection code.
Fixes: 7e28d0b ("drm/i915/adl-n: Enable ADL-N platform")
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220621233005.3952293-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 971e4a9)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>1 parent 046cd8a commit 1391b9c
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
162 | 162 | | |
163 | 163 | | |
164 | 164 | | |
| 165 | + | |
| 166 | + | |
| 167 | + | |
| 168 | + | |
| 169 | + | |
| 170 | + | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + | |
| 173 | + | |
165 | 174 | | |
166 | 175 | | |
167 | 176 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments