Skip to content

Commit 257062d

Browse files
Uwe Kleine-Königalexandrebelloni
authored andcommitted
rtc: xgene: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304133028.2135435-41-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
1 parent 631aa2d commit 257062d

1 file changed

Lines changed: 2 additions & 3 deletions

File tree

drivers/rtc/rtc-xgene.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -192,14 +192,13 @@ static int xgene_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
192192
return 0;
193193
}
194194

195-
static int xgene_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
195+
static void xgene_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
196196
{
197197
struct xgene_rtc_dev *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
198198

199199
xgene_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(&pdev->dev, 0);
200200
device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 0);
201201
clk_disable_unprepare(pdata->clk);
202-
return 0;
203202
}
204203

205204
static int __maybe_unused xgene_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
@@ -264,7 +263,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xgene_rtc_of_match);
264263

265264
static struct platform_driver xgene_rtc_driver = {
266265
.probe = xgene_rtc_probe,
267-
.remove = xgene_rtc_remove,
266+
.remove_new = xgene_rtc_remove,
268267
.driver = {
269268
.name = "xgene-rtc",
270269
.pm = &xgene_rtc_pm_ops,

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)