Commit 3268cb2
committed
cpumask: re-introduce cpumask_next{,_and}_wrap()
cpumask_next_wrap_old() has two additional parameters, comparing to its
generic counterpart find_next_bit_wrap(). The reason for that is
historical.
Before 4fe49b3b97c262 ("lib/bitmap: introduce for_each_set_bit_wrap()
macro"), cpumask_next_wrap() was used to implement for_each_cpu_wrap()
iterator. Now that the iterator is an alias to generic
for_each_set_bit_wrap(), the additional parameters aren't used and may
confuse readers.
All existing users call cpumask_next_wrap() in a way that makes it
possible to turn it to straight and simple alias to find_next_bit_wrap().
In a couple of places kernel users opencode missing cpumask_next_and_wrap().
Add it as well.
CC: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>1 parent dc5bb9b commit 3268cb2
1 file changed
Lines changed: 38 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
284 | 284 | | |
285 | 285 | | |
286 | 286 | | |
| 287 | + | |
| 288 | + | |
| 289 | + | |
| 290 | + | |
| 291 | + | |
| 292 | + | |
| 293 | + | |
| 294 | + | |
| 295 | + | |
| 296 | + | |
| 297 | + | |
| 298 | + | |
| 299 | + | |
| 300 | + | |
| 301 | + | |
| 302 | + | |
| 303 | + | |
| 304 | + | |
| 305 | + | |
| 306 | + | |
| 307 | + | |
| 308 | + | |
| 309 | + | |
| 310 | + | |
| 311 | + | |
| 312 | + | |
| 313 | + | |
| 314 | + | |
| 315 | + | |
| 316 | + | |
| 317 | + | |
| 318 | + | |
| 319 | + | |
| 320 | + | |
| 321 | + | |
| 322 | + | |
| 323 | + | |
| 324 | + | |
287 | 325 | | |
288 | 326 | | |
289 | 327 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments