x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()

kiryl · hansendc · commit 3543f8830bab · 2023-01-27T09:42:09.000-08:00
Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success. Fix the comment. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-2-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__tdx_hypercall)
 	tdcall
 
 	/*
-	 * RAX==0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
+	 * RAX!=0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
 	 * something has gone horribly wrong with the TDX module.
 	 *
 	 * The return status of the hypercall operation is in a separate

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__tdx_hypercall)`
`155`	`155`	`tdcall`
`156`	`156`
`157`	`157`	`/*`
`158`		`- * RAX==0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that`
	`158`	`+ * RAX!=0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that`
`159`	`159`	`* something has gone horribly wrong with the TDX module.`
`160`	`160`	`*`
`161`	`161`	`* The return status of the hypercall operation is in a separate`