PM: runtime: Do not clear needs_force_resume with enabled runtime PM

Commit 89d9cec ("PM: runtime: Clear power.needs_force_resume in
pm_runtime_reinit()") added provisional clearing of power.needs_force_resume
to pm_runtime_reinit(), but it is done unconditionally which is a
mistake because pm_runtime_reinit() may race with driver probing
and removal [1].

To address this, notice that power.needs_force_resume should never
be set when runtime PM is enabled and so it only needs to be cleared
when runtime PM is disabled, and update pm_runtime_init() to only
clear that flag when runtime PM is disabled.

Fixes: 89d9cec ("PM: runtime: Clear power.needs_force_resume in pm_runtime_reinit()")
Reported-by: Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@mediatek.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20251215122154.3180001-1-ed.tsai@mediatek.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: 6.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.17+
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/12807571.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki

Author: rafaeljw

drivers/base/power/runtime.c

@@ -1868,16 +1868,18 @@ void pm_runtime_init(struct device *dev)
  */
 void pm_runtime_reinit(struct device *dev)
 {
-	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
-		if (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE)
-			pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
-		if (dev->power.irq_safe) {
-			spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
-			dev->power.irq_safe = 0;
-			spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
-			if (dev->parent)
-				pm_runtime_put(dev->parent);
-		}
+	if (pm_runtime_enabled(dev))
+		return;
+
+	if (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE)
+		pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
+
+	if (dev->power.irq_safe) {
+		spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+		dev->power.irq_safe = 0;
+		spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+		if (dev->parent)
+			pm_runtime_put(dev->parent);
 	}
 	/*
 	 * Clear power.needs_force_resume in case it has been set by