@@ -14,27 +14,28 @@ architectures).
1414II. How does it work?
1515=====================
1616
17- There are three per-task flags used for that, PF_NOFREEZE, PF_FROZEN
18- and PF_FREEZER_SKIP (the last one is auxiliary). The tasks that have
19- PF_NOFREEZE unset (all user space processes and some kernel threads) are
20- regarded as 'freezable' and treated in a special way before the system enters a
21- suspend state as well as before a hibernation image is created (in what follows
22- we only consider hibernation, but the description also applies to suspend).
17+ There is one per-task flag (PF_NOFREEZE) and three per-task states
18+ (TASK_FROZEN, TASK_FREEZABLE and __TASK_FREEZABLE_UNSAFE) used for that.
19+ The tasks that have PF_NOFREEZE unset (all user space tasks and some kernel
20+ threads) are regarded as 'freezable' and treated in a special way before the
21+ system enters a sleep state as well as before a hibernation image is created
22+ (hibernation is directly covered by what follows, but the description applies
23+ to system-wide suspend too).
2324
2425Namely, as the first step of the hibernation procedure the function
2526freeze_processes() (defined in kernel/power/process.c) is called. A system-wide
26- variable system_freezing_cnt (as opposed to a per-task flag) is used to indicate
27- whether the system is to undergo a freezing operation. And freeze_processes()
28- sets this variable . After this, it executes try_to_freeze_tasks() that sends a
29- fake signal to all user space processes, and wakes up all the kernel threads.
30- All freezable tasks must react to that by calling try_to_freeze(), which
31- results in a call to __refrigerator() (defined in kernel/freezer.c), which sets
32- the task's PF_FROZEN flag, changes its state to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE and makes
33- it loop until PF_FROZEN is cleared for it . Then, we say that the task is
34- 'frozen' and therefore the set of functions handling this mechanism is referred
35- to as 'the freezer' (these functions are defined in kernel/power/process.c,
36- kernel/freezer.c & include/linux/freezer.h). User space processes are generally
37- frozen before kernel threads.
27+ static key freezer_active (as opposed to a per-task flag or state ) is used to
28+ indicate whether the system is to undergo a freezing operation. And
29+ freeze_processes() sets this static key . After this, it executes
30+ try_to_freeze_tasks() that sends a fake signal to all user space processes, and
31+ wakes up all the kernel threads. All freezable tasks must react to that by
32+ calling try_to_freeze(), which results in a call to __refrigerator() (defined
33+ in kernel/freezer.c), which changes the task's state to TASK_FROZEN, and makes
34+ it loop until it is woken by an explicit TASK_FROZEN wakeup . Then, that task
35+ is regarded as 'frozen' and so the set of functions handling this mechanism is
36+ referred to as 'the freezer' (these functions are defined in
37+ kernel/power/process.c, kernel/ freezer.c & include/linux/freezer.h). User space
38+ tasks are generally frozen before kernel threads.
3839
3940__refrigerator() must not be called directly. Instead, use the
4041try_to_freeze() function (defined in include/linux/freezer.h), that checks
@@ -43,31 +44,40 @@ if the task is to be frozen and makes the task enter __refrigerator().
4344For user space processes try_to_freeze() is called automatically from the
4445signal-handling code, but the freezable kernel threads need to call it
4546explicitly in suitable places or use the wait_event_freezable() or
46- wait_event_freezable_timeout() macros (defined in include/linux/freezer .h)
47- that combine interruptible sleep with checking if the task is to be frozen and
48- calling try_to_freeze(). The main loop of a freezable kernel thread may look
47+ wait_event_freezable_timeout() macros (defined in include/linux/wait .h)
48+ that put the task to sleep (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) or freeze it (TASK_FROZEN) if
49+ freezer_active is set. The main loop of a freezable kernel thread may look
4950like the following one::
5051
5152 set_freezable();
52- do {
53- hub_events();
54- wait_event_freezable(khubd_wait,
55- !list_empty(&hub_event_list) ||
56- kthread_should_stop());
57- } while (!kthread_should_stop() || !list_empty(&hub_event_list));
58-
59- (from drivers/usb/core/hub.c::hub_thread()).
60-
61- If a freezable kernel thread fails to call try_to_freeze() after the freezer has
62- initiated a freezing operation, the freezing of tasks will fail and the entire
63- hibernation operation will be cancelled. For this reason, freezable kernel
64- threads must call try_to_freeze() somewhere or use one of the
53+
54+ while (true) {
55+ struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
56+
57+ wait_event_freezable(oom_reaper_wait, oom_reaper_list != NULL);
58+ spin_lock_irq(&oom_reaper_lock);
59+ if (oom_reaper_list != NULL) {
60+ tsk = oom_reaper_list;
61+ oom_reaper_list = tsk->oom_reaper_list;
62+ }
63+ spin_unlock_irq(&oom_reaper_lock);
64+
65+ if (tsk)
66+ oom_reap_task(tsk);
67+ }
68+
69+ (from mm/oom_kill.c::oom_reaper()).
70+
71+ If a freezable kernel thread is not put to the frozen state after the freezer
72+ has initiated a freezing operation, the freezing of tasks will fail and the
73+ entire system-wide transition will be cancelled. For this reason, freezable
74+ kernel threads must call try_to_freeze() somewhere or use one of the
6575wait_event_freezable() and wait_event_freezable_timeout() macros.
6676
6777After the system memory state has been restored from a hibernation image and
6878devices have been reinitialized, the function thaw_processes() is called in
69- order to clear the PF_FROZEN flag for each frozen task. Then, the tasks that
70- have been frozen leave __refrigerator() and continue running.
79+ order to wake up each frozen task. Then, the tasks that have been frozen leave
80+ __refrigerator() and continue running.
7181
7282
7383Rationale behind the functions dealing with freezing and thawing of tasks
@@ -96,7 +106,8 @@ III. Which kernel threads are freezable?
96106Kernel threads are not freezable by default. However, a kernel thread may clear
97107PF_NOFREEZE for itself by calling set_freezable() (the resetting of PF_NOFREEZE
98108directly is not allowed). From this point it is regarded as freezable
99- and must call try_to_freeze() in a suitable place.
109+ and must call try_to_freeze() or variants of wait_event_freezable() in a
110+ suitable place.
100111
101112IV. Why do we do that?
102113======================
0 commit comments