Merge branch 'mptcp-fixes-for-6-4'

Matthieu Baerts says:

====================
mptcp: fixes for 6.4

Patch 1 correctly handles disconnect() failures that can happen in some
specific cases: now the socket state is set as unconnected as expected.
That fixes an issue introduced in v6.2.

Patch 2 fixes a divide by zero bug in mptcp_recvmsg() with a fix similar
to a recent one from Eric Dumazet for TCP introducing sk_wait_pending
flag. It should address an issue present in MPTCP from almost the
beginning, from v5.9.

Patch 3 fixes a possible list corruption on passive MPJ even if the race
seems very unlikely, better be safe than sorry. The possible issue is
present from v5.17.

Patch 4 consolidates fallback and non fallback state machines to avoid
leaking some MPTCP sockets. The fix is likely needed for versions from
v5.11.

Patch 5 drops code that is no longer used after the introduction of
patch 4/6. This is not really a fix but this patch can probably land in
the -net tree as well not to leave unused code.

Patch 6 ensures listeners are unhashed before updating their sk status
to avoid possible deadlocks when diag info are going to be retrieved
with a lock. Even if it should not be visible with the way we are
currently getting diag info, the issue is present from v5.17.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230620-upstream-net-20230620-misc-fixes-for-v6-4-v1-0-f36aa5eae8b9@tessares.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Author: kuba-moo

net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c

@@ -1047,6 +1047,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_create_listen_socket(struct sock *sk,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
+	inet_sk_state_store(newsk, TCP_LISTEN);
 	err = kernel_listen(ssock, backlog);
 	if (err)
 		return err;

net/mptcp/protocol.c

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ enum {
 static struct percpu_counter mptcp_sockets_allocated ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
 static void __mptcp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk);
-static void __mptcp_check_send_data_fin(struct sock *sk);
+static void mptcp_check_send_data_fin(struct sock *sk);
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mptcp_delegated_action, mptcp_delegated_actions);
 static struct net_device mptcp_napi_dev;
@@ -424,8 +424,7 @@ static bool mptcp_pending_data_fin_ack(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 
-	return !__mptcp_check_fallback(msk) &&
-	       ((1 << sk->sk_state) &
+	return ((1 << sk->sk_state) &
 		(TCPF_FIN_WAIT1 | TCPF_CLOSING | TCPF_LAST_ACK)) &&
 	       msk->write_seq == READ_ONCE(msk->snd_una);
 }
@@ -583,9 +582,6 @@ static bool mptcp_check_data_fin(struct sock *sk)
 	u64 rcv_data_fin_seq;
 	bool ret = false;
 
-	if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk))
-		return ret;
-
 	/* Need to ack a DATA_FIN received from a peer while this side
 	 * of the connection is in ESTABLISHED, FIN_WAIT1, or FIN_WAIT2.
 	 * msk->rcv_data_fin was set when parsing the incoming options
@@ -623,7 +619,8 @@ static bool mptcp_check_data_fin(struct sock *sk)
 		}
 
 		ret = true;
-		mptcp_send_ack(msk);
+		if (!__mptcp_check_fallback(msk))
+			mptcp_send_ack(msk);
 		mptcp_close_wake_up(sk);
 	}
 	return ret;
@@ -850,12 +847,12 @@ static bool __mptcp_finish_join(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static void __mptcp_flush_join_list(struct sock *sk)
+static void __mptcp_flush_join_list(struct sock *sk, struct list_head *join_list)
 {
 	struct mptcp_subflow_context *tmp, *subflow;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(subflow, tmp, &msk->join_list, node) {
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(subflow, tmp, join_list, node) {
 		struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
 		bool slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
 
@@ -897,49 +894,6 @@ bool mptcp_schedule_work(struct sock *sk)
 	return false;
 }
 
-void mptcp_subflow_eof(struct sock *sk)
-{
-	if (!test_and_set_bit(MPTCP_WORK_EOF, &mptcp_sk(sk)->flags))
-		mptcp_schedule_work(sk);
-}
-
-static void mptcp_check_for_eof(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
-{
-	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
-	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
-	int receivers = 0;
-
-	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
-		receivers += !subflow->rx_eof;
-	if (receivers)
-		return;
-
-	if (!(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
-		/* hopefully temporary hack: propagate shutdown status
-		 * to msk, when all subflows agree on it
-		 */
-		WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_shutdown, sk->sk_shutdown | RCV_SHUTDOWN);
-
-		smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* SHUTDOWN must be visible first */
-		sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
-	}
-
-	switch (sk->sk_state) {
-	case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
-		inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE_WAIT);
-		break;
-	case TCP_FIN_WAIT1:
-		inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSING);
-		break;
-	case TCP_FIN_WAIT2:
-		inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
-		break;
-	default:
-		return;
-	}
-	mptcp_close_wake_up(sk);
-}
-
 static struct sock *mptcp_subflow_recv_lookup(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 {
 	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
@@ -1609,7 +1563,7 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 	if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
 		mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
 	if (do_check_data_fin)
-		__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
+		mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
 }
 
 static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, bool first)
@@ -1727,7 +1681,13 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
 		if (ret && ret != -EINPROGRESS && ret != -ERESTARTSYS && ret != -EINTR)
 			*copied_syn = 0;
 	} else if (ret && ret != -EINPROGRESS) {
-		mptcp_disconnect(sk, 0);
+		/* The disconnect() op called by tcp_sendmsg_fastopen()/
+		 * __inet_stream_connect() can fail, due to looking check,
+		 * see mptcp_disconnect().
+		 * Attempt it again outside the problematic scope.
+		 */
+		if (!mptcp_disconnect(sk, 0))
+			sk->sk_socket->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
 	}
 	inet_sk(sk)->defer_connect = 0;
 
@@ -2158,9 +2118,6 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 				break;
 			}
 
-			if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_EOF, &msk->flags))
-				mptcp_check_for_eof(msk);
-
 			if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
 				/* race breaker: the shutdown could be after the
 				 * previous receive queue check
@@ -2389,7 +2346,10 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
 
 	need_push = (flags & MPTCP_CF_PUSH) && __mptcp_retransmit_pending_data(sk);
 	if (!dispose_it) {
-		tcp_disconnect(ssk, 0);
+		/* The MPTCP code never wait on the subflow sockets, TCP-level
+		 * disconnect should never fail
+		 */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(tcp_disconnect(ssk, 0));
 		msk->subflow->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
 		mptcp_subflow_ctx_reset(subflow);
 		release_sock(ssk);
@@ -2408,13 +2368,6 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
 		kfree_rcu(subflow, rcu);
 	} else {
 		/* otherwise tcp will dispose of the ssk and subflow ctx */
-		if (ssk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
-			tcp_set_state(ssk, TCP_CLOSE);
-			mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(sk, ssk);
-			inet_csk_listen_stop(ssk);
-			mptcp_event_pm_listener(ssk, MPTCP_EVENT_LISTENER_CLOSED);
-		}
-
 		__tcp_close(ssk, 0);
 
 		/* close acquired an extra ref */
@@ -2671,16 +2624,12 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (unlikely((1 << state) & (TCPF_CLOSE | TCPF_LISTEN)))
 		goto unlock;
 
-	mptcp_check_data_fin_ack(sk);
-
 	mptcp_check_fastclose(msk);
 
 	mptcp_pm_nl_work(msk);
 
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_EOF, &msk->flags))
-		mptcp_check_for_eof(msk);
-
-	__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
+	mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
+	mptcp_check_data_fin_ack(sk);
 	mptcp_check_data_fin(sk);
 
 	if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags))
@@ -2812,13 +2761,19 @@ void mptcp_subflow_shutdown(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, int how)
 			break;
 		fallthrough;
 	case TCP_SYN_SENT:
-		tcp_disconnect(ssk, O_NONBLOCK);
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(tcp_disconnect(ssk, O_NONBLOCK));
 		break;
 	default:
 		if (__mptcp_check_fallback(mptcp_sk(sk))) {
 			pr_debug("Fallback");
 			ssk->sk_shutdown |= how;
 			tcp_shutdown(ssk, how);
+
+			/* simulate the data_fin ack reception to let the state
+			 * machine move forward
+			 */
+			WRITE_ONCE(mptcp_sk(sk)->snd_una, mptcp_sk(sk)->snd_nxt);
+			mptcp_schedule_work(sk);
 		} else {
 			pr_debug("Sending DATA_FIN on subflow %p", ssk);
 			tcp_send_ack(ssk);
@@ -2858,7 +2813,7 @@ static int mptcp_close_state(struct sock *sk)
 	return next & TCP_ACTION_FIN;
 }
 
-static void __mptcp_check_send_data_fin(struct sock *sk)
+static void mptcp_check_send_data_fin(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
@@ -2876,19 +2831,6 @@ static void __mptcp_check_send_data_fin(struct sock *sk)
 
 	WRITE_ONCE(msk->snd_nxt, msk->write_seq);
 
-	/* fallback socket will not get data_fin/ack, can move to the next
-	 * state now
-	 */
-	if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk)) {
-		WRITE_ONCE(msk->snd_una, msk->write_seq);
-		if ((1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_CLOSING | TCPF_LAST_ACK)) {
-			inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
-			mptcp_close_wake_up(sk);
-		} else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_FIN_WAIT1) {
-			inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_FIN_WAIT2);
-		}
-	}
-
 	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
 		struct sock *tcp_sk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
 
@@ -2908,7 +2850,7 @@ static void __mptcp_wr_shutdown(struct sock *sk)
 	WRITE_ONCE(msk->write_seq, msk->write_seq + 1);
 	WRITE_ONCE(msk->snd_data_fin_enable, 1);
 
-	__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
+	mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
 }
 
 static void __mptcp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk)
@@ -2953,10 +2895,24 @@ static __poll_t mptcp_check_readable(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	return EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
 }
 
-static void mptcp_listen_inuse_dec(struct sock *sk)
+static void mptcp_check_listen_stop(struct sock *sk)
 {
-	if (inet_sk_state_load(sk) == TCP_LISTEN)
-		sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
+	struct sock *ssk;
+
+	if (inet_sk_state_load(sk) != TCP_LISTEN)
+		return;
+
+	sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
+	ssk = mptcp_sk(sk)->first;
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ssk || inet_sk_state_load(ssk) != TCP_LISTEN))
+		return;
+
+	lock_sock_nested(ssk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+	mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(sk, ssk);
+	inet_csk_listen_stop(ssk);
+	mptcp_event_pm_listener(ssk, MPTCP_EVENT_LISTENER_CLOSED);
+	tcp_set_state(ssk, TCP_CLOSE);
+	release_sock(ssk);
 }
 
 bool __mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
@@ -2969,7 +2925,7 @@ bool __mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
 	WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_shutdown, SHUTDOWN_MASK);
 
 	if ((1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_LISTEN | TCPF_CLOSE)) {
-		mptcp_listen_inuse_dec(sk);
+		mptcp_check_listen_stop(sk);
 		inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
 		goto cleanup;
 	}
@@ -3073,15 +3029,20 @@ static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags)
 {
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 
+	/* Deny disconnect if other threads are blocked in sk_wait_event()
+	 * or inet_wait_for_connect().
+	 */
+	if (sk->sk_wait_pending)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
 	/* We are on the fastopen error path. We can't call straight into the
 	 * subflows cleanup code due to lock nesting (we are already under
-	 * msk->firstsocket lock). Do nothing and leave the cleanup to the
-	 * caller.
+	 * msk->firstsocket lock).
 	 */
 	if (msk->fastopening)
-		return 0;
+		return -EBUSY;
 
-	mptcp_listen_inuse_dec(sk);
+	mptcp_check_listen_stop(sk);
 	inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
 
 	mptcp_stop_timer(sk);
@@ -3140,6 +3101,7 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sk_clone_init(const struct sock *sk,
 		inet_sk(nsk)->pinet6 = mptcp_inet6_sk(nsk);
 #endif
 
+	nsk->sk_wait_pending = 0;
 	__mptcp_init_sock(nsk);
 
 	msk = mptcp_sk(nsk);
@@ -3327,9 +3289,14 @@ static void mptcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
 	for (;;) {
 		unsigned long flags = (msk->cb_flags & MPTCP_FLAGS_PROCESS_CTX_NEED) |
 				      msk->push_pending;
+		struct list_head join_list;
+
 		if (!flags)
 			break;
 
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&join_list);
+		list_splice_init(&msk->join_list, &join_list);
+
 		/* the following actions acquire the subflow socket lock
 		 *
 		 * 1) can't be invoked in atomic scope
@@ -3340,8 +3307,9 @@ static void mptcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
 		msk->push_pending = 0;
 		msk->cb_flags &= ~flags;
 		spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
+
 		if (flags & BIT(MPTCP_FLUSH_JOIN_LIST))
-			__mptcp_flush_join_list(sk);
+			__mptcp_flush_join_list(sk, &join_list);
 		if (flags & BIT(MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING))
 			__mptcp_push_pending(sk, 0);
 		if (flags & BIT(MPTCP_RETRANSMIT))

net/mptcp/protocol.h

@@ -113,7 +113,6 @@
 /* MPTCP socket atomic flags */
 #define MPTCP_NOSPACE		1
 #define MPTCP_WORK_RTX		2
-#define MPTCP_WORK_EOF		3
 #define MPTCP_FALLBACK_DONE	4
 #define MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW 5
 
@@ -476,14 +475,13 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
 		send_mp_fail : 1,
 		send_fastclose : 1,
 		send_infinite_map : 1,
-		rx_eof : 1,
 		remote_key_valid : 1,        /* received the peer key from */
 		disposable : 1,	    /* ctx can be free at ulp release time */
 		stale : 1,	    /* unable to snd/rcv data, do not use for xmit */
 		local_id_valid : 1, /* local_id is correctly initialized */
 		valid_csum_seen : 1,        /* at least one csum validated */
 		is_mptfo : 1,	    /* subflow is doing TFO */
-		__unused : 8;
+		__unused : 9;
 	enum mptcp_data_avail data_avail;
 	u32	remote_nonce;
 	u64	thmac;
@@ -720,7 +718,6 @@ static inline u64 mptcp_expand_seq(u64 old_seq, u64 cur_seq, bool use_64bit)
 void __mptcp_check_push(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk);
 void __mptcp_data_acked(struct sock *sk);
 void __mptcp_error_report(struct sock *sk);
-void mptcp_subflow_eof(struct sock *sk);
 bool mptcp_update_rcv_data_fin(struct mptcp_sock *msk, u64 data_fin_seq, bool use_64bit);
 static inline bool mptcp_data_fin_enabled(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 {