i2c: i801: Add support for the Process Call command

The Process Call command is implemented by the hardware since the very
first Intel 82801 chipset, and trivial to support. Oscar Romero
Matamala from the Georgia Institute of Technology told me it is needed
for an experiment his team is working on at the moment, so let's just
add support for it.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>

Author: jdelvare

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c

@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
 #define I801_BYTE		0x04
 #define I801_BYTE_DATA		0x08
 #define I801_WORD_DATA		0x0C
-#define I801_PROC_CALL		0x10	/* unimplemented */
+#define I801_PROC_CALL		0x10
 #define I801_BLOCK_DATA		0x14
 #define I801_I2C_BLOCK_DATA	0x18	/* ICH5 and later */
 #define I801_BLOCK_PROC_CALL	0x1C
@@ -838,6 +838,14 @@ static s32 i801_access(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr,
 		}
 		xact = I801_WORD_DATA;
 		break;
+	case I2C_SMBUS_PROC_CALL:
+		outb_p((addr & 0x7f) << 1, SMBHSTADD(priv));
+		outb_p(command, SMBHSTCMD(priv));
+		outb_p(data->word & 0xff, SMBHSTDAT0(priv));
+		outb_p((data->word & 0xff00) >> 8, SMBHSTDAT1(priv));
+		xact = I801_PROC_CALL;
+		read_write = I2C_SMBUS_READ;
+		break;
 	case I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA:
 		outb_p(((addr & 0x7f) << 1) | (read_write & 0x01),
 		       SMBHSTADD(priv));
@@ -910,6 +918,7 @@ static s32 i801_access(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr,
 		data->byte = inb_p(SMBHSTDAT0(priv));
 		break;
 	case I801_WORD_DATA:
+	case I801_PROC_CALL:
 		data->word = inb_p(SMBHSTDAT0(priv)) +
 			     (inb_p(SMBHSTDAT1(priv)) << 8);
 		break;
@@ -935,6 +944,7 @@ static u32 i801_func(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
 
 	return I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE |
 	       I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA |
+	       I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_PROC_CALL |
 	       I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_I2C_BLOCK |
 	       ((priv->features & FEATURE_SMBUS_PEC) ? I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_PEC : 0) |
 	       ((priv->features & FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC) ?