timer_list: Don't use %pK through printk()

This reverts commit f590308 ("timer debug: Hide kernel addresses via
%pK in /proc/timer_list")

The timer list helper SEQ_printf() uses either the real seq_printf() for
procfs output or vprintk() to print to the kernel log, when invoked from
SysRq-q. It uses %pK for printing pointers.

In the past %pK was prefered over %p as it would not leak raw pointer
values into the kernel log. Since commit ad67b74 ("printk: hash
addresses printed with %p") the regular %p has been improved to avoid this
issue.

Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
acquire sleeping looks in atomic contexts.

Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer, easier to reason
about and sufficient here.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250113171731-dc10e3c1-da64-4af0-b767-7c7070468023@linutronix.de/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250311-restricted-pointers-timer-v1-1-6626b91e54ab@linutronix.de

Author: t-8ch

kernel/time/timer_list.c

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void
 print_timer(struct seq_file *m, struct hrtimer *taddr, struct hrtimer *timer,
 	    int idx, u64 now)
 {
-	SEQ_printf(m, " #%d: <%pK>, %ps", idx, taddr, timer->function);
+	SEQ_printf(m, " #%d: <%p>, %ps", idx, taddr, timer->function);
 	SEQ_printf(m, ", S:%02x", timer->state);
 	SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
 	SEQ_printf(m, " # expires at %Lu-%Lu nsecs [in %Ld to %Ld nsecs]\n",
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ print_active_timers(struct seq_file *m, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base,
 static void
 print_base(struct seq_file *m, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base, u64 now)
 {
-	SEQ_printf(m, "  .base:       %pK\n", base);
+	SEQ_printf(m, "  .base:       %p\n", base);
 	SEQ_printf(m, "  .index:      %d\n", base->index);
 
 	SEQ_printf(m, "  .resolution: %u nsecs\n", hrtimer_resolution);