s390/stackleak: Use exrl instead of ex in __stackleak_poison()

exrl is present in all machines currently supported, therefore prefer
it over ex. This saves one instruction and doesn't need an additional
register to hold the address of the target instruction.

Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>

Author: svens-s390

arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h

@@ -163,8 +163,7 @@ static __always_inline void __stackleak_poison(unsigned long erase_low,
 		"	la	%[addr],256(%[addr])\n"
 		"	brctg	%[tmp],0b\n"
 		"1:	stg	%[poison],0(%[addr])\n"
-		"	larl	%[tmp],3f\n"
-		"	ex	%[count],0(%[tmp])\n"
+		"	exrl	%[count],3f\n"
 		"	j	4f\n"
 		"2:	stg	%[poison],0(%[addr])\n"
 		"	j	4f\n"