ext4: find old entry again if failed to rename whiteout

If we failed to add new entry on rename whiteout, we cannot reset the
old->de entry directly, because the old->de could have moved from under
us during make indexed dir. So find the old entry again before reset is
needed, otherwise it may corrupt the filesystem as below.

  /dev/sda: Entry '00000001' in ??? (12) has deleted/unused inode 15. CLEARED.
  /dev/sda: Unattached inode 75
  /dev/sda: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.

Fixes: 6b4b8e6 ("ext4: fix bug for rename with RENAME_WHITEOUT")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210303131703.330415-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Author: zhangyi089

fs/ext4/namei.c

@@ -3613,6 +3613,31 @@ static int ext4_setent(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_renament *ent,
 	return retval;
 }
 
+static void ext4_resetent(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_renament *ent,
+			  unsigned ino, unsigned file_type)
+{
+	struct ext4_renament old = *ent;
+	int retval = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * old->de could have moved from under us during make indexed dir,
+	 * so the old->de may no longer valid and need to find it again
+	 * before reset old inode info.
+	 */
+	old.bh = ext4_find_entry(old.dir, &old.dentry->d_name, &old.de, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(old.bh))
+		retval = PTR_ERR(old.bh);
+	if (!old.bh)
+		retval = -ENOENT;
+	if (retval) {
+		ext4_std_error(old.dir->i_sb, retval);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	ext4_setent(handle, &old, ino, file_type);
+	brelse(old.bh);
+}
+
 static int ext4_find_delete_entry(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir,
 				  const struct qstr *d_name)
 {
@@ -3937,8 +3962,8 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *old_dir,
 end_rename:
 	if (whiteout) {
 		if (retval) {
-			ext4_setent(handle, &old,
-				old.inode->i_ino, old_file_type);
+			ext4_resetent(handle, &old,
+				      old.inode->i_ino, old_file_type);
 			drop_nlink(whiteout);
 		}
 		unlock_new_inode(whiteout);