Skip to content

Commit b8b87e8

Browse files
Uwe Kleine-Königmathieupoirier
authored andcommitted
remoteproc: st: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230504194453.1150368-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
1 parent d1d8d44 commit b8b87e8

1 file changed

Lines changed: 2 additions & 4 deletions

File tree

drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int st_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
448448
return ret;
449449
}
450450

451-
static int st_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
451+
static void st_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
452452
{
453453
struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
454454
struct st_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
@@ -462,13 +462,11 @@ static int st_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
462462
mbox_free_channel(ddata->mbox_chan[i]);
463463

464464
rproc_free(rproc);
465-
466-
return 0;
467465
}
468466

469467
static struct platform_driver st_rproc_driver = {
470468
.probe = st_rproc_probe,
471-
.remove = st_rproc_remove,
469+
.remove_new = st_rproc_remove,
472470
.driver = {
473471
.name = "st-rproc",
474472
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(st_rproc_match),

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)