Commit c1081a7
doc: blk-ioprio: Bring the doc in line with the implementation
Our system administrator have noted that the names 'rt-to-be' and
'all-to-idle' in the I/O priority policies table appeared without
explanations, leading to confusion. Let's bring these names in line
with the naming in the 'attribute' section.
Additionally,
1. Correct the interface name to 'io.prio.class'.
2. Add a table entry of 'promote-to-rt' for consistency.
3. Fix a typo of 'priority'.
Suggested-by: Yingfu Zhou <yingfu.zhou@shopee.com>
Reviewed-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231012024228.2161283-1-yizhou.tang@shopee.com1 parent 16794ed commit c1081a7
1 file changed
Lines changed: 6 additions & 4 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
2023 | 2023 | | |
2024 | 2024 | | |
2025 | 2025 | | |
2026 | | - | |
| 2026 | + | |
2027 | 2027 | | |
2028 | 2028 | | |
2029 | 2029 | | |
| |||
2052 | 2052 | | |
2053 | 2053 | | |
2054 | 2054 | | |
2055 | | - | |
| 2055 | + | |
2056 | 2056 | | |
2057 | | - | |
| 2057 | + | |
| 2058 | + | |
| 2059 | + | |
2058 | 2060 | | |
2059 | 2061 | | |
2060 | 2062 | | |
| |||
2074 | 2076 | | |
2075 | 2077 | | |
2076 | 2078 | | |
2077 | | - | |
| 2079 | + | |
2078 | 2080 | | |
2079 | 2081 | | |
2080 | 2082 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments