bpf: put uprobe link's path and task in release callback

There is no need to delay putting either path or task to deallocation
step. It can be done right after bpf_uprobe_unregister. Between release
and dealloc, there could be still some running BPF programs, but they
don't access either task or path, only data in link->uprobes, so it is
safe to do.

On the other hand, doing path_put() in dealloc callback makes this
dealloc sleepable because path_put() itself might sleep. Which is
problematic due to the need to call uprobe's dealloc through call_rcu(),
which is what is done in the next bug fix patch. So solve the problem by
releasing these resources early.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328052426.3042617-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Author: anakryiko

kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c

@@ -3157,16 +3157,16 @@ static void bpf_uprobe_multi_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
 
 	umulti_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link, link);
 	bpf_uprobe_unregister(&umulti_link->path, umulti_link->uprobes, umulti_link->cnt);
+	if (umulti_link->task)
+		put_task_struct(umulti_link->task);
+	path_put(&umulti_link->path);
 }
 
 static void bpf_uprobe_multi_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
 {
 	struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link *umulti_link;
 
 	umulti_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link, link);
-	if (umulti_link->task)
-		put_task_struct(umulti_link->task);
-	path_put(&umulti_link->path);
 	kvfree(umulti_link->uprobes);
 	kfree(umulti_link);
 }