Commit eb5616d
x86/ACPI: CPPC: Move init_freq_invariance_cppc() into x86 CPPC
The init_freq_invariance_cppc code actually doesn't need the SMP
functionality. So setting the CONFIG_SMP as the check condition for
init_freq_invariance_cppc may cause the confusion to misunderstand the
CPPC. And the x86 CPPC file is better space to store the CPPC related
functions, while the init_freq_invariance_cppc is out of smpboot, that
means, the CONFIG_SMP won't be mandatory condition any more. And It's more
clear than before.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
[ rjw: Subject adjustment ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>1 parent 666f6ec commit eb5616d
3 files changed
Lines changed: 15 additions & 23 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
225 | 225 | | |
226 | 226 | | |
227 | 227 | | |
228 | | - | |
| 228 | + | |
229 | 229 | | |
230 | 230 | | |
231 | | - | |
232 | 231 | | |
233 | | - | |
234 | 232 | | |
235 | 233 | | |
236 | 234 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
87 | 87 | | |
88 | 88 | | |
89 | 89 | | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
| 94 | + | |
| 95 | + | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
| 102 | + | |
| 103 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
83 | 83 | | |
84 | 84 | | |
85 | 85 | | |
86 | | - | |
87 | | - | |
88 | | - | |
89 | | - | |
90 | 86 | | |
91 | 87 | | |
92 | 88 | | |
| |||
2156 | 2152 | | |
2157 | 2153 | | |
2158 | 2154 | | |
2159 | | - | |
2160 | | - | |
2161 | | - | |
2162 | | - | |
2163 | | - | |
2164 | | - | |
2165 | | - | |
2166 | | - | |
2167 | | - | |
2168 | | - | |
2169 | | - | |
2170 | | - | |
2171 | | - | |
2172 | | - | |
2173 | | - | |
2174 | | - | |
2175 | 2155 | | |
2176 | 2156 | | |
2177 | 2157 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments