mfd: sec-irq: s2dos05 doesn't support interrupts

The commit bf231e5 ("mfd: sec-core: Add support for the Samsung
s2dos05") adding s2dos05 support didn't add anything related to IRQ
support, so I assume this works without IRQs.

Rather than printing a warning message in sec_irq_init() due to the
missing IRQ number, or returning an error due to a missing irq chip
regmap, just return early explicitly.

This will become particularly important once errors from sec_irq_init()
aren't ignored anymore in an upcoming patch and helps the reader of
this code while reasoning about what the intention might be here.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250409-s2mpg10-v4-15-d66d5f39b6bf@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>

Author: andred

drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c

@@ -452,16 +452,12 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
 	int type = sec_pmic->device_type;
 	const struct regmap_irq_chip *sec_irq_chip;
 
-	if (!sec_pmic->irq) {
-		dev_warn(sec_pmic->dev,
-			 "No interrupt specified, no interrupts\n");
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	switch (type) {
 	case S5M8767X:
 		sec_irq_chip = &s5m8767_irq_chip;
 		break;
+	case S2DOS05:
+		return 0;
 	case S2MPA01:
 		sec_irq_chip = &s2mps14_irq_chip;
 		break;
@@ -492,6 +488,12 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
 				     sec_pmic->device_type);
 	}
 
+	if (!sec_pmic->irq) {
+		dev_warn(sec_pmic->dev,
+			 "No interrupt specified, no interrupts\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(sec_pmic->dev, sec_pmic->regmap_pmic,
 				       sec_pmic->irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
 				       0, sec_irq_chip, &sec_pmic->irq_data);