Skip to content

Commit a80c1ff

Browse files
author
aligneddev
committed
add lost .mds
1 parent ad4e70b commit a80c1ff

4 files changed

Lines changed: 875 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

‎specs/001-project-scaffold/checklists/requirements.md‎

Lines changed: 88 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
1+
# Specification Quality Checklist: Project Structure and Scaffolding
2+
3+
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
4+
**Created**: 2026-03-11
5+
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
6+
7+
## Content Quality
8+
9+
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
10+
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
11+
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
12+
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
13+
14+
## Requirement Completeness
15+
16+
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
17+
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
18+
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
19+
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
20+
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
21+
- [x] Edge cases are identified
22+
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
23+
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
24+
25+
## Feature Readiness
26+
27+
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
28+
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
29+
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
30+
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
31+
32+
## Validation Notes
33+
34+
### Content Quality Assessment
35+
36+
**No implementation details**: ✓ Specification focuses on what needs to be built (multi-project structure, hello screen, API endpoint) rather than how to build it (no mention of specific HTTP frameworks, DOM APIs, or deployment tools).
37+
38+
**Business/User focused**: ✓ All user stories center on developer experience and project usability. Success criteria measure developer productivity and ease of setup.
39+
40+
**Non-technical stakeholder friendly**: ✓ Language is accessible to non-developers. Terms like "hello screen," "API endpoint," and "orchestration" are explained through context.
41+
42+
**All sections completed**: ✓ Specification includes User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria, Assumptions, and Scope Boundaries.
43+
44+
### Requirement Assessment
45+
46+
**No clarifications needed**: ✓ All requirements are specific:
47+
- "simple hello screen" is clearly understood via acceptance scenarios
48+
- "callable endpoint" defined as health check or sample data
49+
- "build with dotnet build" is unambiguous
50+
- Frontend framework (TypeScript/Vue) is reasonable default based on existing project
51+
52+
**Requirements are testable**: ✓ Examples:
53+
- FR-005: "buildable with `dotnet build`" → clear pass/fail
54+
- FR-007: "display hello screen" → verifiable by opening browser
55+
- FR-008: "callable endpoint" → verifiable by making HTTP request
56+
57+
**Success criteria are measurable**: ✓ Examples:
58+
- SC-001: "under 10 minutes following README" → measurable time
59+
- SC-004: "within 5 seconds" → specific metric
60+
- SC-007: "90% of developers successfully" → quantified percentage
61+
62+
**Success criteria are technology-agnostic**: ✓ Criteria focus on user-facing outcomes:
63+
- "displays hello screen within 5 seconds" (not "Vue component renders in 100ms")
64+
- "responds within 2 seconds" (not "ASP.NET Core response time")
65+
- No framework or language specifics in criteria
66+
67+
**Acceptance scenarios defined**: ✓ All 4 user stories include Given-When-Then scenarios that are independently testable.
68+
69+
**Edge cases identified**: ✓ Three edge cases listed:
70+
- Outdated Node.js version
71+
- Port collision
72+
- Missing .NET SDK
73+
74+
**Scope clearly bounded**: ✓ "Scope Boundaries" section explicitly lists In Scope and Out of Scope items, including exclusion of database, authentication, and business logic.
75+
76+
**Assumptions documented**: ✓ Nine assumptions listed covering prerequisites, frameworks, scope definitions, and technology choices.
77+
78+
## Quality Summary
79+
80+
**Status**: ✓ READY FOR PLANNING
81+
82+
All validation items pass. The specification is:
83+
- Complete with all mandatory sections
84+
- Clear and unambiguous
85+
- Testable and measurable
86+
- Properly scoped
87+
- Free of implementation details
88+
- Ready to proceed to `/speckit.plan` for implementation planning

‎specs/001-project-scaffold/plan.md‎

Lines changed: 231 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
1+
# Implementation Plan: Project Structure and Scaffolding
2+
3+
**Branch**: `001-project-scaffold` | **Date**: 2026-03-11 | **Spec**: [spec.md](spec.md)
4+
**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/001-project-scaffold/spec.md`
5+
6+
## Summary
7+
8+
Create a well-structured, multi-project .NET solution that demonstrates modern development practices for a bike tracking application. The solution must be buildable, runnable, and include a basic working hello screen on the frontend and a callable API. This establishes the foundation for all future development with clear separation of concerns and proper orchestration using .NET Aspire.
9+
10+
## Technical Context
11+
12+
**Language/Version**: .NET 10+ (specified in global.json)
13+
**Primary Dependencies**:
14+
- .NET Aspire (service orchestration)
15+
- ASP.NET Core (API framework)
16+
- Vue + TypeScript + Vite (frontend framework)
17+
- F# (domain logic layer)
18+
19+
**Storage**: N/A (no database in this phase - out of scope)
20+
**Testing**: Not included in scaffolding phase
21+
**Target Platform**: Windows, macOS, Linux (multi-platform support)
22+
**Project Type**: Multi-project monorepo (Web service + Frontend + Orchestration)
23+
**Performance Goals**: Pages load in <5 seconds, API responds in <2 seconds
24+
**Constraints**:
25+
- No database setup or ORM configuration
26+
- No authentication/authorization implementation
27+
- Only scaffold structure, no feature implementation
28+
- Hello screen must be simple (static or minimal interactivity)
29+
30+
**Scale/Scope**: 5 core projects, buildable solution, single developer can run entire stack locally
31+
32+
## Project Structure
33+
34+
### Documentation (this feature)
35+
36+
```text
37+
specs/001-project-scaffold/
38+
├── plan.md # This file
39+
├── spec.md # Feature specification
40+
├── checklists/
41+
│ └── requirements.md # Spec quality validation
42+
└── tasks.md # Phase breakdown (generated by /speckit.tasks)
43+
```
44+
45+
### Source Code (repository root)
46+
47+
```text
48+
src/
49+
├── BikeTracking.Api/ # ASP.NET Core REST API
50+
│ ├── Program.cs # Minimal API configuration
51+
│ ├── appsettings.json # Configuration
52+
│ └── Properties/
53+
│ └── launchSettings.json # Launch profiles
54+
│
55+
├── BikeTracking.Frontend/ # Vue + TypeScript + Vite SPA
56+
│ ├── src/
57+
│ │ ├── index.html # Hello screen entry point
58+
│ │ ├── main.ts # App initialization
59+
│ │ ├── my-app.ts # Main component
60+
│ │ └── my-app.html # Template
61+
│ ├── package.json # Dependencies
62+
│ ├── vite.config.ts # Vite configuration
63+
│ └── tsconfig.json # TypeScript configuration
64+
│
65+
├── BikeTracking.Domain.FSharp/ # F# domain logic
66+
│ ├── Library.fs # Domain definitions
67+
│ └── BikeTracking.Domain.FSharp.fsproj
68+
│
69+
├── BikeTracking.AppHost/ # .NET Aspire orchestration
70+
│ ├── AppHost.cs # Service orchestration
71+
│ └── Properties/
72+
│ └── launchSettings.json # Launch profiles
73+
│
74+
└── BikeTracking.ServiceDefaults/ # Shared service configuration
75+
├── Extensions.cs # Common extension methods
76+
└── BikeTracking.ServiceDefaults.csproj
77+
78+
BikeTracking.slnx # Solution file (uncontrolled format)
79+
global.json # .NET version constraint
80+
README.md # Setup and running documentation
81+
82+
.aspire/ # Aspire configuration cache
83+
.vscode/ # VS Code workspace settings
84+
.specify/ # SpecKit configuration and templates
85+
```
86+
87+
**Structure Decision**: Multi-project monorepo with clear layered architecture:
88+
1. **API Layer** (BikeTracking.Api) - HTTP endpoints and request handling
89+
2. **Frontend Layer** (BikeTracking.Frontend) - User interface
90+
3. **Domain Layer** (BikeTracking.Domain.FSharp) - Core business logic (F# for type safety)
91+
4. **Infrastructure Layer** (BikeTracking.ServiceDefaults) - Shared configurations
92+
5. **Orchestration** (BikeTracking.AppHost) - Service wiring and local development environment
93+
94+
This structure provides:
95+
- Clear separation of concerns
96+
- Ability to develop frontend/backend independently
97+
- Use of F# for type-safe domain modeling
98+
- Unified orchestration for local development with Aspire
99+
100+
## Design Decisions
101+
102+
### 1. .NET Aspire for Orchestration
103+
**Decision**: Use .NET Aspire for service orchestration and configuration
104+
**Rationale**:
105+
- Built-in tooling for .NET multi-project applications
106+
- Enables local development with realistic multi-process setup
107+
- Reduces configuration friction
108+
- Standard for modern .NET applications
109+
110+
### 2. Minimal APIs
111+
**Decision**: Use minimal APIs pattern for API endpoints (no controllers)
112+
**Rationale**:
113+
- Modern .NET approach with less boilerplate
114+
- Lightweight and easy to understand
115+
- Better for small services and verification endpoints
116+
- Aligns with Aspire best practices
117+
118+
### 3. Vue + Vite for Frontend
119+
**Decision**: Continue with existing Vue + Vite + TypeScript setup
120+
**Rationale**:
121+
- Already configured in existing project
122+
- Modern development experience with hot reload
123+
- Type safety with TypeScript
124+
- Good ecosystem and community support
125+
126+
### 4. F# for Domain Logic
127+
**Decision**: Include F# project for domain logic
128+
**Rationale**:
129+
- Type-driven development benefits for core business logic
130+
- Immutability by default reduces bugs
131+
- Pattern matching for complex domain modeling
132+
- Already present in project structure
133+
134+
### 5. No Database in Phase 1
135+
**Decision**: Exclude database, ORM, and data persistence
136+
**Rationale**:
137+
- Specified as out of scope
138+
- Allows focus on project structure and integration
139+
- Can be added in subsequent phases
140+
- Simpler to verify correct scaffolding
141+
142+
## Implementation Phases
143+
144+
### Phase 1: Setup & Foundation
145+
- Verify and document project structure
146+
- Configure solution file to include all projects
147+
- Set up shared service defaults
148+
- Create README with setup instructions
149+
150+
### Phase 2: API Project
151+
- Configure minimal APIs in Program.cs
152+
- Add health check endpoint
153+
- Configure routing and middleware
154+
- Enable hot reload and logging
155+
156+
### Phase 3: Frontend Project
157+
- Create hello screen component
158+
- Configure development server
159+
- Enable hot reload
160+
- Add basic styling
161+
162+
### Phase 4: Orchestration & Integration
163+
- Configure AppHost to orchestrate API and Frontend
164+
- Set up service discovery
165+
- Configure environment-specific settings
166+
- Test end-to-end integration
167+
168+
### Phase 5: Documentation & Polish
169+
- Complete README with running instructions
170+
- Document API endpoints
171+
- Add troubleshooting guide
172+
- Verify all success criteria met
173+
174+
## Dependencies & Integration Points
175+
176+
```
177+
BikeTracking.Frontend
178+
├─> API calls to BikeTracking.Api
179+
└─> Vite build system (npm/yarn)
180+
181+
BikeTracking.Api
182+
├─> BikeTracking.ServiceDefaults (extensions)
183+
├─> BikeTracking.Domain.FSharp (business logic)
184+
└─> .NET Aspire hosting
185+
186+
BikeTracking.AppHost
187+
├─> BikeTracking.Api (orchestrates)
188+
├─> BikeTracking.Frontend (orchestrates)
189+
└─> BikeTracking.ServiceDefaults (configuration)
190+
191+
BikeTracking.Domain.FSharp
192+
└─> (no external project dependencies)
193+
194+
BikeTracking.ServiceDefaults
195+
└─> (infrastructure only, no feature dependencies)
196+
```
197+
198+
## Success Metrics
199+
200+
All items from spec.md Success Criteria must be met:
201+
202+
1. **SC-001**: New developer setup in <10 minutes with README guidance
203+
2. **SC-002**: `dotnet build` completes without errors
204+
3. **SC-003**: AppHost orchestrates services without crashes
205+
4. **SC-004**: Frontend displays hello screen in <5 seconds
206+
5. **SC-005**: API health endpoint responds in <2 seconds
207+
6. **SC-006**: 5+ projects documented in README
208+
7. **SC-007**: 90% developer success rate on first attempt
209+
8. **SC-008**: Uses modern .NET tooling (Aspire, .NET 10+, minimal APIs)
210+
211+
## Complexity Tracking
212+
213+
| Item | Rationale |
214+
|------|-----------|
215+
| 5 Projects | Clear separation: API, Frontend, Domain, Defaults, Orchestration. Simpler structure (3 projects) inadequate for demonstrating multi-tier architecture |
216+
| F# Project | Type-driven domain modeling. Direct C# insufficient for showcasing functional patterns |
217+
| Aspire Usage | Enterprise-grade orchestration. Manual configuration inadequate for complex multi-service setup |
218+
| Vue Frontend | Modern SPA framework required. Plain HTML insufficient for demonstrating hot reload and component patterns |
219+
220+
## File Locations & Artifacts
221+
222+
| Artifact | Location | Purpose |
223+
|----------|----------|---------|
224+
| Solution File | `BikeTracking.slnx` | Include all 5 projects |
225+
| Global Config | `global.json` | Enforce .NET 10+ |
226+
| README | `README.md` | Setup, running, structure documentation |
227+
| API Program | `src/BikeTracking.Api/Program.cs` | Minimal API endpoints |
228+
| Frontend Entry | `src/BikeTracking.Frontend/src/main.ts` | App initialization |
229+
| Hello Screen | `src/BikeTracking.Frontend/src/my-app.html` | Hello screen template |
230+
| AppHost | `src/BikeTracking.AppHost/AppHost.cs` | Service orchestration |
231+
| Service Defaults | `src/BikeTracking.ServiceDefaults/Extensions.cs` | Shared configuration |

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)