| file_type | documentation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| title | WordPress Spec to Implementation Workflow | |||
| description | Workflow for converting approved requirements into sequenced implementation tasks and validation. | |||
| version | v0.1.0 | |||
| last_updated | 2026-05-28 | |||
| owners |
|
|||
| tags |
|
This workflow systematically converts a specification (requirements) into executable implementation tasks, sequenced for efficient delivery and validated against acceptance criteria.
- User stories are well-written and specific
- Acceptance criteria are clear and testable
- Technical constraints are documented
- Dependencies are identified
- Success metrics defined
- Risk assessment completed
- Requirements are unambiguous
- No conflicting requirements
- Scope is appropriately bounded
- Timeline is realistic
- Resource requirements understood
- All stakeholders aligned
- Product owner approval
- Technical lead review
- Team capacity verified
- Risks acknowledged
- Documented in GitHub issue
-
Identify Components: Break feature into discrete components
- Backend services/APIs
- Frontend UI components
- Database schema changes
- Configuration updates
- Documentation updates
-
Create User Stories: One story per implementable unit
- "As a [user], I want [feature], so that [benefit]"
- Acceptance criteria: 2-5 specific, testable criteria
- Story points: 2-8 (8 is maximum for a 1-week task)
-
Map Dependencies: Identify task ordering
- Database changes before API changes
- APIs before UI components
- Testing infrastructure before tests
- Documentation before release
## [Component Name]
### Description
[1-2 sentence description of what to build]
### Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 1]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 2]
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 3]
### Technical Notes
[Implementation approach, libraries, patterns]
### Dependencies
- Depends on: [other tasks]
- Blocks: [other tasks]
### Estimate
[Story points or hours]
### Testing
- Unit tests: [coverage target]
- Integration tests: [scenarios to cover]
- E2E tests: [user flows to test]
### Definition of Done
- [ ] Code written and reviewed
- [ ] Tests pass with 80%+ coverage
- [ ] Linting passes
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] Accessibility verified
- [ ] Performance acceptable- Identify blocking dependencies
- Create task sequence
- Estimate total effort
- Identify parallel work opportunities
-
Assign to Sprints: 1-2 week cycles
- Critical path items first
- Balance parallel work
- Leave 20% capacity for bugs/interrupts
- Include testing and documentation
-
Resource Allocation
- Assign each task to team member(s)
- Consider skill levels and experience
- Distribute workload evenly
- Pair inexperienced with experienced
-
Risk Mitigation
- Identify high-risk items
- Plan spike investigations if needed
- Build in buffer time
- Create fallback plans
-
Create Feature Branch
git checkout -b feature/[component-name] -
Implement Per Acceptance Criteria
- Write tests first (TDD)
- Implement functionality
- Refactor for quality
- Document changes
-
Code Review
- Self-review against acceptance criteria
- Request peer review
- Address feedback
- Verify all checks pass
-
Merge When Ready
- All reviews approved
- All checks passing
- Coverage maintained or improved
- Manual testing against acceptance criteria
- Integration testing with other features
- Performance testing
- Security testing
- Accessibility testing
- Cross-browser testing
- README updated
- API docs current
- Examples provided
- Changelog updated
- Migration guide (if breaking changes)
- All acceptance criteria met
- All tests passing
- Documentation complete
- Release notes prepared
- Stakeholder sign-off received
- Feature delivered on time
- All acceptance criteria met
- Test coverage ≥ 80%
- Code review feedback minimal (<3 rounds)
- Zero post-release bugs (28-day window)