doc(minutes): add 11 Mar 2026 (#22)

Author: JakobJingleheimer

minutes/2026-03-11 test-runner meeting minutes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# 11 March 2026
+
+## Attendees
+
+* Diogo de Souza [@sozua](https://github.com/sozua)
+* Jacob Smith [@JakobJingleheimer](https://github.com/JakobJingleheimer) (chair)
+* Pietro Marchini [@pmarchini](https://github.com/pmarchini)
+
+## Topics
+
+* doc(proposal): un/break --test [nodejs/test-runner#13](https://github.com/nodejs/test-runner/pull/13)
+  * change test flag to subcommand? `node --test` → `node test`
+* High-impact suggestions from Colin [nodejs/test-runner#21](https://github.com/nodejs/test-runner/issues/21)
+
+## Outcomes
+
+* From a technical standpoint, a `test` subcommand appears to be much easier than we expected.
+  * It's however not obvious why this is not used more. We suspect it might be due to the breaking change where `node test` would have run `node ./test.js` (or `node ./test/index.js`)
+
+## Todos
+
+* @JakobJingleheimer: To ask around about lack of subcommands
+  * Antoine FtW: it's indeed because of the breaking change suspected in the above discussion.
+* @JakobJingleheimer: To keep an ear to the ground for the TC39 discussion about relaxing the requirement for dynamic import to always return the same.
+* Consolidate `defaultExport` & `namedExports` [nodejs/node#61727](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/61727) needs some reviews and some opinions on whether old or new should "win" a conflict.