Repository navigation
fix: knowledge workflow permission #7758
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the shown diff, the change is generally reasonable, but there are several important issues to address before merging.
Critical issues
1. UI hiding is not authorization
Using
v-if="knowledgeWorkflowPermission(...)"only hides controls. The handlers are still callable via keyboard shortcuts, programmatic calls, or other UI paths:handleSavehandleOpenPublishhandleExportWorkflowhandleAutoSaveChangeAdd permission checks inside the handlers as well. Server-side authorization must also enforce these rules.
2. Auto-save may continue running after permission is lost
You hide the auto-save switch, but if
autoSaveEnabledwas alreadytrue, the auto-save logic may continue saving. This is especially risky for shared/read-only resources.You should stop auto-save when edit permission becomes unavailable:
Also guard
handleAutoSaveChangeand the auto-save execution path.3. Verify
knowledgeIdis not aref/computedThe helper uses:
If
knowledgeIdis areforcomputed, this passes aRefobject instead of the actual ID. In that case, use:The same applies if
isSystemResource,isSystemSharedResource, orisWorkspaceSharedResourceare computed values rather than functions.Potential behavioral issue
4. Workspace-shared resources always return
falseThis line:
blocks all three permissions, including
workflowExport. If export is intended to be allowed for read-only shared resources, this is too restrictive. Confirm whetherworkflowExportshould really be blocked here.Minor improvements
5. Avoid repeated permission calls in the template
knowledgeWorkflowPermission(...)is called multiple times per render. Prefer computed properties:Then use:
This improves readability, avoids repeated permission logic, and makes watchers/guards easier.
6. Prefer extensionless import
This:
may work in Vite, but extensionless imports are more conventional and avoid TypeScript/bundler configuration issues:
7. Consider a guard for missing permission methods
If
permis not fully typed or can change between versions, a missing method will throw:You could defensively check:
Only do this if
permis not strongly typed.Suggested refactor
Overall: the diff is syntactically plausible, but the main missing piece is enforcing the same permission checks in the action handlers and auto-save lifecycle, not only in the template.