Repository navigation
fix: [Agent] When the "Specified Response" node is set to HTML format, the content in the debugging dialog appears empty, failing to render the HTML code correctly. #7772
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here are my findings on this diff:
Issues / Potential Problems
Type/Behavior duplication with
TEXTHTMLaggregator is functionally identical toTEXT(string concatenation). If HTML chunks ever need special handling (e.g., tag balancing,<script>sanitization, or streaming partial tags), this will silently misbehave. At minimum, add a comment clarifying the intended difference fromTEXT.No HTML sanitization
Inconsistent
?? prevpatternchunk.id ?? prev.idandchunk.workflowRunId ?? prev.workflowRunIdfollow the existing convention inGROUP, so consistent — OK. But notecontentuses||semantics (falsy fallback) while others use??. That matchesTEXT, so acceptable; just be aware empty-string vs undefined ordering.Missing trailing comma
HTMLinaggregatorslacks a trailing comma; inconsistent style with the rest of the object. Minor.Repeated boilerplate
TEXT,REASONING,HTML, etc.) now share nearly identical merge logic. Consider extracting aconcatAggregator(type)factory:const HTML = concatAggregator('HTML'). Reduces drift when fields change.No test coverage shown
Type safety on
aggregatorsas Record<string, ContentAggregator>casts away key specificity. Prefersatisfies Record<string, ContentAggregator>(TS 4.9+) or an explicit interface so misspelled keys like'Html'are caught.Minor
@@ ... @@) shows odd characters (,-,+const) that appear corrupted in paste — verify the patch applies cleanly in your tooling.'HTML'case-sensitively everywhere; mismatched casing would bypass this aggregator and drop chunks.