Skip to content

docs(D-SAG-3): OpenPsi × Rubikon × CARE wisdom-frontier research and ONA/Hyperon probes - #1511

Closed
AdaWorldAPI wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
research/sag-openpsi-rubicon-care-wisdom-frontier
Closed

AdaWorldAPI wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
research/sag-openpsi-rubicon-care-wisdom-frontier

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI

@AdaWorldAPI AdaWorldAPI commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Why

Follow-up to merged #1509 / D-SAG-1 (based directly on its merge commit 42fa2a3). #1509 proved one-hop SoftwareGraph projection and ordinary Quack execution for real MethodTable entries. This draft asks whether that same substrate can host a falsifiable wisdom-seeded epistemic frontier and support motivating, deliberating about, and auditing investigations without introducing a second graph engine.

Research synthesis: OpenPsi demands + Heckhausen/Gollwitzer Rubikon + Kanban lifecycle + CE64 test-local Maturation3 (7→0) + typed prerequisite popcount + calibrated Shannon EIG + CARE reference-conditioned executable scoring + independent causal ablation + ONA/Hyperon comparison.

Included

  1. D-SAG-2 research/implementation plan — concrete substrate mapping, stage-0 recursive frontier, masked missing/refuted/known distinctions, schemas as proposals, explicit MultiHopBlocked, OpenPsi→Rubikon→permission→receipt loop, CARE gate, pre-registered metrics, 16 numbered falsifiers and stop conditions.
  2. Annotated .arxiv literature shelf — 13 source treatments with links, short paraphrased excerpts/takeaways, claim-vs-transfer distinction and disconfirming experiments: CARE (2606.14581v5), Hyperon (2310.18318), metagraph folding (2012.01759), Shannon, Oudeyer/Kaplan intrinsic motivation, causal EIG (2103.15229; 2203.02016), NARS self, ONA MeTTa-NARS, OpenPsi incl. upstream open PR feat: 6 EmbedAnything patterns — auto-detect, chunker, tensor bridge + practices #117, Rubikon, modern PLN.
  3. Claude Code execution prompt — actionable P0 source census → P1 scalar oracle/disable-red probes → P2 legal Quack parity → P3 pinned foreign oracles → P4 scheduler ablation → P5 CARE/Rubikon simulated actions → P6 SAG optimization proposals. Includes hard acceptance gates, nonclaims, exact starting paths and runtime links.

Architectural decisions explicitly not made

First falsifier

With one independent scalar oracle and identical fixtures, compare plain fixed-point hydration and stage-0-seeded popcount priority over: A→B→C, independent vs duplicate roots, grounded/ungrounded cycles, after-anchor ablation, 0/1/3 missing typed prerequisites, refuted vs unknown, stale schema seal and storage-order permutations. Forbid 0 missing → automatic certification. Require guard-disable RED and restore evidence before any engine/attention benchmark.

Only after this: matched-budget FIFO, confidence, popcount, naive entropy (negative control), calibrated EIG, OpenPsi demand and CARE-gated challenger arms; freeze inference rules when varying scheduler, and vice versa. Count total work.

Status

Research-only, regardless of GitHub review flag: source census, semantic oracle and CE64 semantic-layout decision remain open. No auto-merge or production feature claims. The PR's current review state is left unchanged.

Related: #1494 maturation, #1497 PLN/Shannon, #1498 Hyperon translation, #1500 Rubikon, #1509 SAG.

Second wave added: deferred hard problems, not hidden feature claims

Three new linked documents and two original handoffs updated.

New first-risk priority: correct deletion/retraction and unread-vs-false semantics. A simple popcount speedup is not useful if withdrawing one independent observation leaves a stale learned consequence, or an unread directory edge is mistaken for an empty permission set.

Explicit nonclaims: no Rust experiments, outside-runtime tests, incremental engine, authorization integration, CE64 migration, new opcode, cryptographic audit signature, ONA-Hyperon parity or causal-awareness result were produced by these documentation commits. Any benchmark, SIMD gain or implementation is still pending.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

Your organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab.

Next included review available in 31 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Your 62 included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Essentials
  • Run ID: ce8d5eaa-2ff9-49bd-a22f-8beeb4ec8e14

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42fa2a3 and d8040d2.


📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .arxiv/2026-10_openpsi_rubicon_care_wisdom_frontier_source_excerpts.md
  • .arxiv/2026-10_wisdom_frontier_active_inference_delta_and_misspecification.md
  • .claude/plans/sag-wisdom-frontier-hard-problems-v1.md
  • .claude/plans/sag-wisdom-frontier-ona-hyperon-v1.md
  • .claude/prompts/sag-wisdom-frontier-adversarial-expansion.md
  • .claude/prompts/sag-wisdom-frontier-claude-code.md

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2026 19:24
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-12T19:26:21.339006Z 406248a Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

AdaWorldAPI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
#1510, #1511, #1513 and #1515 all claimed D-SAG-2 with conflicting
sub-numbering. #1510 keeps D-SAG-2; this plan becomes D-SAG-4. Mechanical
rename of the PR's own ids only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011BMJnDBAfzcuQh5HeT39Rh
AdaWorldAPI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
#1510, #1511, #1513 and #1515 all claimed D-SAG-2 with conflicting
sub-numbering. #1510 keeps D-SAG-2; this plan becomes D-SAG-5. Mechanical
rename of the PR's own ids only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011BMJnDBAfzcuQh5HeT39Rh
@AdaWorldAPI AdaWorldAPI changed the title docs(D-SAG-2): OpenPsi × Rubikon × CARE wisdom-frontier research and ONA/Hyperon probes docs(D-SAG-3): OpenPsi × Rubikon × CARE wisdom-frontier research and ONA/Hyperon probes Oct 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Superseded by #1523. Every commit from this branch is merged there unchanged except for the alignment edits.

Changes for this PR:

  • The Proposal {…} scheduler record is renamed SchedulerDecision, because it selects work and changes nothing.
  • "Any optimization is a proposal" now reads ProposedMethod.
  • The missing mask in the plan and in the prompt now excludes unread prerequisites, matching your own hard-problems H1. The two had contradicted each other.

Closing in favour of the capstone.


Generated by Claude Code

AdaWorldAPI added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2026
SAG capstone alignment: #1510, #1511, #1512, #1513, #1515, #1517 merged; ProposedMethod canonical
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants