Repository navigation
docs(D-SAG-3): OpenPsi × Rubikon × CARE wisdom-frontier research and ONA/Hyperon probes - #1511
AdaWorldAPI wants to merge 9 commits into
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedYour organization has reached its usage spending cap. Adjust your spending cap in the billing tab. Next included review available in 31 minutes. View limit details
Warning Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption. Comment |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
…and 18 adversarial falsifiers
…ential-dataflow excerpts
#1510, #1511, #1513 and #1515 all claimed D-SAG-2 with conflicting sub-numbering. #1510 keeps D-SAG-2; this plan becomes D-SAG-3. Mechanical rename of the PR's own ids only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011BMJnDBAfzcuQh5HeT39Rh
#1510, #1511, #1513 and #1515 all claimed D-SAG-2 with conflicting sub-numbering. #1510 keeps D-SAG-2; this plan becomes D-SAG-4. Mechanical rename of the PR's own ids only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011BMJnDBAfzcuQh5HeT39Rh
#1510, #1511, #1513 and #1515 all claimed D-SAG-2 with conflicting sub-numbering. #1510 keeps D-SAG-2; this plan becomes D-SAG-5. Mechanical rename of the PR's own ids only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011BMJnDBAfzcuQh5HeT39Rh
|
Superseded by #1523. Every commit from this branch is merged there unchanged except for the alignment edits. Changes for this PR:
Closing in favour of the capstone. Generated by Claude Code |
Why
Follow-up to merged #1509 / D-SAG-1 (based directly on its merge commit 42fa2a3). #1509 proved one-hop SoftwareGraph projection and ordinary Quack execution for real MethodTable entries. This draft asks whether that same substrate can host a falsifiable wisdom-seeded epistemic frontier and support motivating, deliberating about, and auditing investigations without introducing a second graph engine.
Research synthesis: OpenPsi demands + Heckhausen/Gollwitzer Rubikon + Kanban lifecycle + CE64 test-local Maturation3 (7→0) + typed prerequisite popcount + calibrated Shannon EIG + CARE reference-conditioned executable scoring + independent causal ablation + ONA/Hyperon comparison.
Included
Architectural decisions explicitly not made
First falsifier
With one independent scalar oracle and identical fixtures, compare plain fixed-point hydration and stage-0-seeded popcount priority over: A→B→C, independent vs duplicate roots, grounded/ungrounded cycles, after-anchor ablation, 0/1/3 missing typed prerequisites, refuted vs unknown, stale schema seal and storage-order permutations. Forbid 0 missing → automatic certification. Require guard-disable RED and restore evidence before any engine/attention benchmark.
Only after this: matched-budget FIFO, confidence, popcount, naive entropy (negative control), calibrated EIG, OpenPsi demand and CARE-gated challenger arms; freeze inference rules when varying scheduler, and vice versa. Count total work.
Status
Research-only, regardless of GitHub review flag: source census, semantic oracle and CE64 semantic-layout decision remain open. No auto-merge or production feature claims. The PR's current review state is left unchanged.
Related: #1494 maturation, #1497 PLN/Shannon, #1498 Hyperon translation, #1500 Rubikon, #1509 SAG.
Second wave added: deferred hard problems, not hidden feature claims
Three new linked documents and two original handoffs updated.
New first-risk priority: correct deletion/retraction and unread-vs-false semantics. A simple popcount speedup is not useful if withdrawing one independent observation leaves a stale learned consequence, or an unread directory edge is mistaken for an empty permission set.
Explicit nonclaims: no Rust experiments, outside-runtime tests, incremental engine, authorization integration, CE64 migration, new opcode, cryptographic audit signature, ONA-Hyperon parity or causal-awareness result were produced by these documentation commits. Any benchmark, SIMD gain or implementation is still pending.