Skip to content

docs(research): semantic Morton grammar ABI, Moore pressure and qualia-masked DO - #1545

Merged
AdaWorldAPI merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/semantic-morton-qualia-do-map
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

AdaWorldAPI merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/semantic-morton-qualia-do-map

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Research-only draft: capture the 2026-10-13 semantic-geometry insight while it is fresh. Proposes a versioned grammar ABI in which 12×12 predicate families are a candidate semantic spectrum, Haspelmath-style cross-language grammatical-function graphs provide topology, Morton nibbles provide progressively finer Cartesian loci, Moore8 contextual readings provide semantic pressure, and observed qualia modulates selection masks for OGAR-authorized DO. No hardware/register/ABI changes, no action permissions changed, and no implementation claim.

Meaning as Cartesian locus + relational topology + semantic pressure; qualia-conditioned masked DO rather than 144 isolated verb executors.

The crucial geometry (corrected)

Morton depth Bits Grid Loci
2 nibbles 8 16×16 256 (144 candidate palette positions, 112 unmapped)
3 nibbles 12 64×64 4,096
4 nibbles 16 256×256 65,536

4,096 is one Morton nibble below 65,536. The final nibble is spatial refinement (4×4 children), not a qualia code. Qualia is a separate typed reading.

Files

  1. Architecture RFC: the 144-predicate color-wheel hypothesis, identity vs semantic map vs Cartesian projection, Morton hierarchy, Moore8 pressure, qualia state, masking algebra, ClassView/Quack/R2IL/OGAR/CE64 boundaries, scalar/formal encoding distinctions, experiments SMD-P00..P18 and open decisions.
  2. Haspelmath source notes: page/figure-specific reading of The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning (2003), cross-linguistic multifunctionality, proposed ABI mappings, SM-Q01..Q12 and explicit “the author did not claim this” ledger. Public author-hosted source: https://zenodo.org/records/831410 .
  3. Staged falsifier / execution plan: D-SMD-0..6, repository contract audit before code, scalar Morton proof vectors, held-out grammar regions, equal-budget Moore/Shannon/EIG tests, qualia ablations, rank-1 vs sparse representation counterexample, graph-locality tests and OGAR ActionDef authorization.

Explicit architectural invariants

  • Current physical byte/ALU/ISA register layout is immutable for this RFC. No CE64 bit reassignment: bits 43..52 already have documented code semantics. See CE64 semantic upper half.
  • 12×12 verbs/predicate families vs 12×12 family×role/TAM matrix require source audit; do not silently equate them.
  • Graph-semantic adjacency is not guaranteed by Morton/Cartesian adjacency. Codebook identity survives embedding changes through versioned projections.
  • Qualia means an operational, observable internal-state reading influencing salience/selection; no proof of subjective phenomenal awareness is claimed.
  • A mask is not authorization. Goal, read, grammar, qualia and method-action restrictions stay separate; OGAR owns actual DO permission and side effects.
  • “Universal grammar,” “holographic,” “Borg-able” and “resonance” are explicit research hypotheses with negative controls, not established properties.

Reuse before reinvention

Connect to #1496 (CE64 / NAL), #1497 (Shannon/PLN/Moore attention), #1498 (Hyperon/MeTTa folding), #1500 (Rubikon volition), #1501 (class-method HotPlug / OGAR DO authority), and #1509 (software-awareness graph). Reuse existing ClassView/WideFieldMask, Quack, R2IL, mask-risc, ndarray and the actual codebook/tenant contract instead of proposing a second engine.

Review and validation

  • Source chapter reviewed and mapped to specific pages/figures (source-derived facts separated from novel engineering hypotheses).
  • 8→12→16 bit Morton arithmetic, masks and competing storage schemes defined with explicit counterexamples.
  • Full falsifier matrix, kill criteria and next-session implementation prompt recorded.
  • Docs-only branch compared with main: 3 new files, 3 commits, no behind commits at PR creation.
  • Verify actual 12×12 palette/VerbRoleTable, HHTL and Moore source implementations against current HEAD (D-SMD-0).
  • Execute scalar Morton and grammar test fixtures (future PR).
  • Confirm embedding, qualia causality, generalization and action-gate properties empirically (future PR).
  • CI / repository-specific doc generator and policy gates (not run in this documentation-only connector session).

Intent: preserve the intellectual structure and falsifiability first. Do not merge this into a claim of implemented cognition; implementation is gated behind explicit source inventory and experiments.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 7425d37b-b5ae-487d-b418-64fefcba2b1d
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI marked this pull request as ready for review October 13, 2026 22:35
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-13T22:37:10.527668Z aa4e50d Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: aa4e50d8e6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

intervention = OGAR_authorized_DO(chosen)
observed_effect != predicted_effect ? update_evidence() : verify()

CE64 remains the causal and epistemic evidence plane. Association is not intervention; the actual executed intervention and witness establish whether stronger causal certification is warranted. The CE64 layout and code meanings in docs/architecture/ce64-semantic-upper-half.md are authoritative. In particular bits 43..52 **are not free** for semantic pressure/qualia in current code.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Point implementers to the actual CE64 authority

When a follow-up session implements the proposed CE64 integration, this sentence incorrectly makes docs/architecture/ce64-semantic-upper-half.md authoritative. That document explicitly labels itself a working model rather than the definition and says that crates/causal-edge/src/layout.rs and the code's names win when they disagree; it also contains several proposed readings that differ from current behavior. Following this RFC literally could therefore canonize a proposed diagram interpretation, so name the layout and implementation as authoritative and describe the document as explanatory.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Add Carrot credits or activate Agent usage billing to use Autofix

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI merged commit 9f889c2 into main Oct 14, 2026
4 checks passed
AdaWorldAPI added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2026
…board

board: record #1546 (D-RA-1 relalg) and #1545 as merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant