Skip to content

Finite bit construction: R439 frame 506 uses 21 ADDs (no new kappa) - #1001

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
ToikY:codex/bit-seed18
Oct 13, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
ToikY:codex/bit-seed18

Conversation

@ToikY

@ToikY ToikY commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Finite bit-supplier construction: reschedule PR589 R439's frame506 B[102:128) as two exact positive-integer factors with 9+12=21 rather than 26 ADDs. Rebuild required literal full-frame cleanup; the complete local bill is 24,305→24,295 ADDs. No new κ is claimed.

The new evidence is a witness outside Aaron Wang's merged #891 whole-block destination-once class (minimum 24 at 506). Splitting at original gate 114 permits intermediate rows and a second destination write across factors. Discovery exhausts all 25 original cuts103–127; the minimum 21 occurs at114–116. A separate disjoint-donor-subset/backward Bellman implementation confirms the 9/12 minima without importing discovery. This is a restricted-class minimum, not unrestricted circuit optimality.

Validation passed:

  • Exact integer endpoints and signed inverses on all ten dirty basis columns; all 1024 local Boolean inputs; six independent arithmetic mutations.
  • Pinned owning checker on all 661 dirty columns, H1–H5, complete frame paths, nine COPY/ERASE pairs and unchanged paid profile/rank mass 5129.
  • Independently emitted full records equal the pinned exporter byte for byte; six full-word/invoice mutations reject. Forward positive bound 49347; reverse 1113070→1107058; payload 93 bits below 104.
  • Unchanged C++17/Boost native legality and 5/9/11-stage replay on both words, 883/1327/1549 formal columns,96 rejected omitted-bridge controls; full local/stage bills and signed prefixes.
  • Four packaging tests (optimized/environment replay, minimal relocation, corrupt-source certificate preservation, factor/word binding), regenerated search/certificate checks, selected-record integrity and staged whitespace.

Reproduce with standard-library Python 3.11+:

python3 -I -B research/r439-frame506-two-factor/search.py --check && python3 -I -B research/r439-frame506-two-factor/verify.py

Expected: PASS_R439_FRAME506 block=26->21 ADDs=24305->24295 columns=661 inputs=1024 controls=6 no_new_kappa. Native replay command and exact source/toolchain pins are in the package README; exact receipts, coverage, negative controls and proof are committed.

Research base 407d52f, OS assignment seed 18, bit-supplier track. Selected PR942/T37 remains conditional κ 0.001661960547713947, with unchanged PR589 supplier head a5afc8c. Refreshed main 8bddbee leaves all 18 consumed/context source pins unchanged. Only research/r439-frame506-two-factor/ is added; upstream and selected frontier remain unchanged. No pinned coordination issue was found, so the narrow claim is local.

Overlap: #914 (Ross Richardson) supplies the adapted integer solver/verification pattern on frame524; #891's506 component is improved by three B ADDs while its523 result is not composed. Concurrent #980 changes A and leaves B unchanged. #989 composes 507/508/519/524 and excludes 506. Their savings are not summed here. This is not the smallest known full R439 circuit or a mechanism-priority claim.

Credit eumemic #555/#543, DreamingOfClouds #589/#545 and lineage, Dylan Crow, DaysSky, Zhihao Chen, Aaron Wang #891, Ross Richardson #908/#914, Ali Romman/Alluri native harness ancestry and the selected complex predecessors. Prepared for Eva Ayala (@ToikY) with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance, including one scoped AI worker for independent arithmetic/review. Apache-2.0; no independent human review is implied.

The all-size/compiler, common-label/mutable-source realization, whole-call hosting, precision/tape and analytic obligations remain inherited. No full global hosted invoice, selected cold replay, outer assembly, full-theorem formalization, measured speedup or remote CI pass is claimed. The paid recursive profile is unchanged and complex still binds. Please review as a finite construction, not a new conditional bound. Do not merge automatically.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants