Repository navigation
research: realize PR992 sharp T29 profile with exact bin inventories - #1160
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 14, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
|
100-PR batch review at Merged to Reviewed scope: Exact capacity-tagged T29 pattern witnesses attain the prior aggregate profile with two realizations; physical chronology and owner admission are not inferred. The pinned scoped command passed; the batch ledger contains its command, input hashes, environment and log. This incorporates the research/tooling contribution and does not change the selected κ or discharge the inherited multiplication-theorem assumptions. Batch review, attribution and evidence. Thank you for the contribution. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR #992 gives a sharp T=29 residual profile in the historical fixed-U8 arithmetic relaxation, while explicitly leaving bin-type realization outside its scope. This contribution supplies an exact capacity-tagged integer packing for that profile, satisfying all four bin-capacity quotas and all five whole-helper width inventories.
The ten-pattern certificate accounts for all 58,464 bins and 131,544 helpers, including 49,770 zero-residual bins. A short proof explains why zero signed-price slack forces every bin to be tight and identifies the resulting structural constraints. A separate agent independently derived a different valid ten-pattern witness before seeing the implementation. Both realizations are checked; this establishes nonuniqueness without asserting a larger feasible family.
Validation:
python3 -I -O -B research/t29-capacity-audit/verify.pychecks source pins, one Cartesian enumeration of all 1,163 legal patterns and an independent maximum-price dynamic program, the exact witness, and 31 negative controls for malformed certificates and inventory violations.ba82555c64e1879e4b7decce28186f208fcb8262and freshly fetched mainc0e3631dc24e3c24a861f7d3d79e0608481cccec.Scope: abstract capacity-tagged packing for the fixed U8 T29 inventory only. This does not construct invocation-specific matching, chronology, geometry, a physical owner schedule, or a new κ; it does not concern the changed PR #1042 supplier. It confirms that the predecessor’s sharpness example survives these inventory constraints, without alleging a defect in the predecessor.
Base:
ba82555c64e1879e4b7decce28186f208fcb8262. All changes are confined toresearch/t29-capacity-audit/; the selected frontier and upstream sources are unchanged.Credits: Chafik Boukhalfa (#795/#890 prices and family), Jonathan Capalbo (#942 all-replica relaxation), woklerx (#992 sharpness and slack lattice), and Hao Yan (#858 controller lineage). Substantial AI assistance: Claude Fable 5.1 implementation, GPT-6 Astra independent mathematical review, Gemini 3.8 Flash control brainstorming, and Codex coordination. Separate-agent review is not human peer review. See the package proof, source pins, and review receipts for evidence and limitations.