Repository navigation
Audit: bind retained PR589 supplier identity and COPY deficit - #1329
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 14, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
|
100-PR batch review at Merged to Reviewed scope: Retained bit-supplier source binding, independent nine rank-seven COPY recount, and adversarial provenance guard. Pins and controls strengthen coverage of the existing 10,272 deficit; no selected supplier modification or new κ. The pinned scoped command passed; the batch ledger contains its command, input hashes, environment and log. This incorporates the research/tooling contribution and does not change the selected κ or discharge the inherited multiplication-theorem assumptions. Batch review, attribution and evidence. Thank you for the contribution. |
6 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change and mathematical scope
PR #1277 leaves a concrete next question: can the retained PR589 supplier identity be bound when an assembly preserves its accepted numbers but names a false commit/blob? This adds an opt-in source-binding guard, confined to
research/retained-bit-supplier-binding/. The finding and broader ancestry-equality repair remain Sagar Thakrar’s; this is the complementary executable guard.The guard checks the exact PR589 record and compressed word across the contributor’s original
research/e8-bit-p111/path, the integration commit, and main’s renamedresearch/e8-bit-p111-tuned/path. It independently follows D/A frame assignments and ranks the nine COPY frames over Q: nine rank-seven totals, decoder constant 63, and64*28416 - 1808352 = 32*(8*111 - 9*63) = 10272. All four committed PR741/799/1042/1094 assemblies and the archived bit result pass.--assemblyand--bit-resultguard newly emitted outputs against that exact source; an optional receipt hashes the exact byte snapshots checked. False provenance, a same-blob different real commit, compensating COPY ranks and a mass-preserving histogram change are rejected. The implementation imports no supplier/frame/moment checker and runs under-I -O -B.No new κ, circuit, paid-profile change or production adoption. Existing verifiers, frozen inputs and the selected record are unchanged. The frame trace measures COPY ranks only; it does not establish scalar/frame legality or H1–H5. Recorded profile/budget fields remain inputs. No full cold/native/scalar/phase replay, certified moment, all-size/compiler, hosting, precision/tape, exact-recovery or analytic proof is claimed. PR1277’s original acceptance fixture is credited, not freshly replayed here. Both this guard and its broader ancestry-equality repair would be needed in a successor wrapper.
Task and overlap
bce54fb3f895cbe5cd4c0eb477c3afeed100190f; contribution:1356813dddd0e03ea138743a799c2aece15f7d44.supplier-boundary-audit, refined to source identity/COPY deficit; nonce78116c731f9a59be32e8cd1544265921, adversarial-audit track, priority revision 2. TASK.json records scope, domain and stop rule.a5afc8c6169ea61ba7c51dfd3cade02cc7b13b46; integration:b3eb785ac5b4b1ca2beea0f80db078a505626a90; EXPECTED blob:e293ddc557742637f9f679f083a1a282d87b1b13. SOURCES.json pins 11 live inputs and two historical provenance records.02d279515ff1fc468ab99a19d89461f1b6391507, owns the finding and next question; #1307 treats bit projectors; #1312 treats complex-owner X2. No pending PR is a code dependency.Validation
Windows 11, CPython 3.12.14, standard library plus Git:
All pass. Registered replay includes the deterministic receipt plus 10 test groups / 23 rejection fixtures, actual CLI rejection and relocated-input/source-corruption checks. The card’s historical owner-boundary positive control also passes. The final package replay was rerun after the receipt-byte-snapshot change.
The broader
test_research_*.pysuite ran 20 tests and reported 3 Windows errors in unchanged tests: missingos.killpgon the deliberate timeout path, plus temporary-directory cleanup errors. Process-localcore.autocrlf=falseand workspace scratch directories were used. This is recorded as a failed broader suite, not a pass; package checks succeed separately.Credit
Arham Tahir, with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance for research, implementation, testing and writing; no subagents or independent human review. Credit Sagar Thakrar / #1277, DreamingOfClouds / #589, eumemic / #555, the #545 rank-mass identity, Douglas Colkitt’s integration/bindings, Rohan Arun, Jeremy Kothe, Hao Yan, nightangelflowerwin-ops / #865, Lucas Steinmetz / #838 and the retained supplier lineage. Existing notices remain intact; new work is Apache-2.0.
Open next questions
README.md and TASK.json give the next task: combine this guard with #1277’s ancestry equality in a successor wrapper, exercise the false-source/timing variants, then cold-replay. Maintainer acceptance and versioned source/coverage pins block production adoption.