Skip to content

Consolidation: overlap receipt for the open selected-replay tooling PRs; #1142 fails on main and collides with #1108 (no new kappa) - #1654

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
JosieElliston:research/selected-replay-tooling-receipt
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
JosieElliston:research/selected-replay-tooling-receipt

Conversation

@JosieElliston

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Consolidation receipt. No new κ, no disposition, nothing closed. The selected frontier, pinned files and upstream/ are unchanged.

This adds one package, research/selected-replay-tooling-receipt/, with three parts:

  • RECEIPT.json: exact-head overlap and retention facts for eight open PRs;
  • verify.py: a stdlib checker;
  • a README.

Family. Seven of the PRs have the selected #1094 cold replay path (1094 → 1042 → 799 → 741) as their premise: #1101, #1142, #1151, #1277, #1361, #1509 and #1646. The eighth, #1108, is included because #1142 re-adds its package. Four of them (#1101, #1108, #1142, #1151) are in QUEUE-CURSOR.json's next batch.

Findings, at base 1f7a9349

Checks

Task and overlap

Open next questions

  1. Repin Independent verification: selected PR1042 replay-capsule closure (no new κ) #1142 and drop its seed51 copy? This needs the contributor or a maintainer.
  2. Next-batch path collisions. I ran an unregistered scan of the 100 next_batch heads; details are in the README. Besides Research: exact compact-control boundary cancellation obstruction (no new kappa) #1108/Independent verification: selected PR1042 replay-capsule closure (no new κ) #1142, these conflict textually:
  3. Whether to wire the opt-in speedups into the pinned cold chain. This needs a maintainer.

Credit

AI disclosure. Prepared by Josie Elliston's donated session with Claude Code (Claude Opus). A Codex read-only review raised four points, all fixed. The equality claims of the speed-up PRs are now stated separately. --heads now checks pairwise path disjointness, with a control. The cold-chain and #1277 checks are tighter. The wording on #1646's base is corrected. There was no independent human review. Apache-2.0.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Exact-head retention and overlap facts for CrocSwap#1101, CrocSwap#1108, CrocSwap#1142, CrocSwap#1151,
CrocSwap#1277, CrocSwap#1361, CrocSwap#1509 and CrocSwap#1646 against main 1f7a934, with a stdlib
checker. CrocSwap#1142 fails on current main (stale selected-record pin) and
re-adds an earlier copy of CrocSwap#1108's package (add/add conflict).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Mister-Meeseeks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Batch review at 13fb0d18b093d04909074f4e0498af7abbcbc2d4.

Merged to main, preserving the original contributor commits and package attribution.

Reviewed scope: Historical eight-head replay-tooling overlap receipt at pinned base, including stale capsule pointer and bundled-copy conflict. Base facts corroborated; author trial-merge timings are retained evidence, not new dispositions or current queue status.

The pinned scoped command passed; the batch ledger contains its command, input hashes, environment and log. This incorporates the research/tooling contribution and does not change the selected κ or discharge the inherited multiplication-theorem assumptions.

Batch review, attribution and evidence. Thank you for the contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants