Repository navigation
Scoped proof: label saturation narrows four swaps to 10 or 12 calls - #1722
Conversation
|
Batch review at Merged to Reviewed scope: Written label-saturation proof gives n_b >= 2t when n_a=t, for arbitrary restored workspace, using the full sign identity and chronological covector span. Independent finite controls corroborate it; four swaps still permit an unresolved balanced ten-call word at at most six roles. The pinned scoped command passed; the batch ledger contains its command, input hashes, environment and log. This incorporates the research/tooling contribution and does not change the selected κ or discharge the inherited multiplication-theorem assumptions. Batch review, attribution and evidence. Thank you for the contribution. |
Four coordinate-SWAP targets require at least ten paid coordinate-CNOT calls, with a direct twelve-call upper bound, even with arbitrary finite restored dirty workspace. Any ten-call word must use five calls of each label. Whether that word exists remains open; PR1541's credited compression reduces the remaining case to at most six roles.
The new uniform lemma is
n_a=t => n_b>=2t, and symmetrically, fortswaps in formalF2[GL_2(F2)]. At equality, normalized paid projectors do not couple the dirty complement. The proof uses chronological block-row rigidity, the full sign matrix and a zero rank-one sum whose image and covector spans both have rank at leastt. An explicit four-projector near miss explains why the covector premise cannot be omitted.This also gives an analytic alternative proof of the known nine-call three-swap result. Cinna Davis's #1541 retains priority for that arbitrary-workspace theorem; commdata2338's #1414/#1491 retain the earlier results. The four-swap conclusion sharpens Aaron Wang's #1705
(8, 10, 12)boundary at exactly four registers to(10, 12)with arbitrary dirty workspace. No pending implementation is imported.Only
research/coordinate-cnot-label-saturation/is added: proof, reproducible finite evidence, two separate implementations, corruption tests and explicit replay/provenance metadata. Exact source base:0b1cccf86e2f5132ed286a26ef0a681a495740ea; tested contribution:246cd6b3a795a346bc6a741661ddcdb2d6359103. Discussion #1715 records coordination. The final overlap refresh covered 408 open PRs and 358 Discussion records with complete pagination and no warnings; search limitations and exact predecessor heads are in TASK.json.Validation on the committed head:
make selected-record-checkand whitespace/status checks pass.Reproduce:
The all-register result rests on the written proof; finite checks corroborate it. Scalar mixing/workspace are free only in the stated optimistic model, while every address call and undo is paid. No new kappa, selected-frontier change, physical/compiler/hosting/precision admission, full selected cold replay, Lean or independent human proof review is claimed. Hosted CI remains a separate gate.
Credit Gareth Davidson #1333 for scalar normalization and the restricted-alphabet question, plus the eumemic #288 / Ali Romman #468 / David Govea #720 lineage. Prepared for Ross Richardson with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance in reasoning, implementation, checking and writing; one agent. Apache-2.0.