Skip to content

Research: higher-rank paired boundary at a single ADD gate - #1836

Draft
1337isnot1337 wants to merge 3 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
1337isnot1337:codex/imb-cycle9
Draft

1337isnot1337 wants to merge 3 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
1337isnot1337:codex/imb-cycle9

Conversation

@1337isnot1337

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scope

Cycle seed 3444f4b8606069e8d454447c1dc60c12; track complex-mechanisms; task complex-rank-shape-decoder; priority revision 3; exact base 0b1cccf86e2f5132ed286a26ef0a681a495740ea. Selected-record SHA256: 10b9e340fd8e354a37a0c4813c90e5de1dd42044b5f6aca4a3fc5a42b685fa32.

This is a finite conditional interface screen for one binary ADD gate with two positive frame climbs where at least one quotient rank exceeds one. It extends the rank-one J2 proposal in draft PR #1764 by treating the higher-rank pair (r,s) as one hypothetical J_{r,s} child of rank r+s. It does not admit that supplier or claim a new κ.

Exact mechanism and census

On the pinned selected local word (compressed FULL-WORD.json.gz SHA256 49596aa4ed4fd36cd4582fd0e8ddeb09fd80370a7d8aea1ede52a135b536d289; decompressed SHA256 c2b294300760e1fd6eeab8c22c4d13e4633dca40e52cac8da0d68163a76e3ca8), each qualifying gate is the exact shear T_c(x,y)=(x+c y,y), determinant one with inverse T_-c. If the old dirty frames are U,V and the common target is F, then U×V has codimension r+s in F×F; the invertible shear preserves its dimension, so the joint boundary has codimension r+s.

The full scan checks A, B and scheduled cleanup-tail operations in both orientations, exact rational coefficients, monotone frame inclusion and old/new endpoints. It finds 359 higher-rank gate pairs:

  • (1,2): 72; (1,3): 52; (1,4): 35; (1,5): 26
  • (2,2): 14; (2,3): 5; (2,4): 19
  • (3,3): 122; (3,4): 6; (4,4): 8

CENSUS.tsv records the exact source gate and frame identifiers for each row; RESULT.json is reconstructed by the verifier.

Conditional cost result

The comparison starts from the selected profile {1:2412,2:418,3:432,4:142,5:82,8:8}. For a like-for-like conditional extension it reconstructs PR #1764's 753 rank-one pairs (590 same-gate pairs plus 163 terminal pairs), then applies only these 359 higher-rank gate pairings:

Using the selected fixed-word ceiling routine on a 10^-12 grid, the conditional ceiling improves by at least 5.956346700% over the PR #1764 candidate and 11.510179694% over the selected baseline profile. This assumes zero extra joint-interface cost.

At 1.05 times the upper endpoint of the PR #1764 ceiling, the exact rank-one-equivalent overhead allowance is 43 additional child costs per local call; 44 fail. A hypothetical one-rank-one adapter per each of the 359 boundaries gives a relaxation moment above one and misses the 5% incremental target. The complete source, copy, helper, hosting, restoration, phase and precision ledger is in the README.

Reproduce and limits

python3 -B research/complex-joint-higher-rank-seed3444f4/verify.py
python3 -I -O -B research/complex-joint-higher-rank-seed3444f4/verify.py
python3 scripts/research_package.py --package research/complex-joint-higher-rank-seed3444f4 --check-only
make selected-record-check

Both direct replays pass under local Python 3.14.7; package source-pin validation and make selected-record-check pass. Python 3.12 is unavailable in this environment, so the registered Python 3.12 replay was not run locally. Four mutation controls reject a changed coefficient, rank sum, inverse matrix and old-frame endpoint.

Predecessors are PR #1764 / Discussion #1765 (rank-one joint pairs), PR #1814 / Discussion #1167 (three-source consecutive gather), and PR #1817 / Discussion #1596 (diagonal rank-one batching). This package does not compose their profiles. The proposed J_{r,s} supplier, physical adapters and complete-call hosting remain open; no global assembly, selected-result change or new κ is claimed.

Substantial OpenAI Codex assistance is disclosed in the package. The research claim and final overlap snapshots are recorded there; the claim is Discussion #1167, comment #18922740.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant