Skip to content

Root-code floors T·r_min for exact root-unit decoders with the dense pairing (sharp on E8, P112, P104, E7, D4, D6), a dense polar law and a place bound (no κ claim) - #2228

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
DreamingOfClouds:research/ideal-decoder-floors
Oct 15, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
DreamingOfClouds:research/ideal-decoder-floors

Conversation

@DreamingOfClouds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Root-code floors T·r_min for exact root-unit decoders with the dense pairing (sharp on E8, P112, P104, E7, D4, D6), a dense polar law and a place bound (no κ claim)

Package research/ideal-decoder-floors. Model, cost formula and exact decoders are those of the closed #446 and the merged #595/#1590 and of #2111/#2125; the E8, P112 and P104 floors are those of #620, #717 (D1), #1212, #968, #1077, #1180, #1236, #1744, #1714, re-derived here by one argument. This PR adds the lower-bound side for other units and a derivation of why the block rank is k + 1.

Place bound (PROVEN, every T). For every number field, prime 𝔭 | 2 and shift a: cost(B) ≥ |S_a|, the number of lines whose leading 2-adic terms do not cancel (Theorem 1). A tropical argument caps |S_a| by the largest pairwise orthogonal set, ≤ T for Gram decoders M = D₁GD₂ on every even root unit (Proposition 2). The 2-adic/tropical corollary and Lemma VCR2 of #2162 already contain Theorem 1's mechanism (all lines surviving, T = 3) and Proposition 2's cycle condition; no novelty is claimed for that part. CHECKED: frame bases attain it (8, 7, 4, 6 on E8, E7, D4, D6), so the ceiling is attained there and far below the optima (8 against 72 on E8, 7 against 49 on E7); a rank-of-sum witness of rank 44 shows that no certificate of the form rank_Q(G∘C) over admissible coverage C (bit model) proves more than 44 for the E8 value 72.

Dense polar law (PROVEN). For an odd-or-zero unit the dense pairing is B_ts = Ω(u_t, u_s) with u_t = (1, ℓ_t) and Ω = 1 ⊕ b on F2 ⊕ F2^k, so every term costs at most k + 1, and the rank of a block is an Ω-pairing rank (Theorem 3). This proves the upper bounds behind #968's rule "7 iff both normals are punctured and α·β is odd, else 8" (equalities CHECKED: E8, all 14,400 normal pairs: 9 / 8 / 8 / 7), and the rebuilt P104 frame-pair decoder costs 56 = 8 × 7 on 104 live lines (CHECKED).

Root-code floor (PROVEN + CHECKED). For exact decoders whose two factors lie in the live root code, for the dense pairing, over a field of characteristic 0 and with any number of terms: cost ≥ T·r_min (Theorem 4; r_min is a minimum over finitely many deficiency types). Sharp, with explicit exact decoders attaining it: E8 72, P112 64, P104 56, E7 49, E7 minus a 7-frame 42, D4 12, D6 30. For E7, #2125 found 49 as the first gain (an upper bound); here 49 is a lower bound in this class. For D5 and E6 the pairwise floors are 15 and 30; the forced form N ∝ Gram (CHECKED, N-space of dimension 1; for E6 this is #2137's kernel QG, which has priority) and a coupling lemma give square decoders ≥ 20 (D5) and ≥ 36 = v (E6), from CHECKED incidences (all 27 × 27 deficient E6 pairs are non-orthogonal).

Scope and caveats. The floor is for the dense pairing and for root-code factors only; it is not a bound over sparser admissible pairings, over factors outside the root code (cf. the 9-term decoder of #1180), over non-Gram geometries, or over overcomplete E6 (m = 7: 35 < 36 not excluded) and D5. Conjecture ID (cost* = min(v, T(k+1) − usable deficiencies)) is a conjecture; it matches the ten values on record (each in its stated scope). Forced triangular minors (#2176's tool) give only 7 per co-flat E8 term. Where the place bound is stated for every T it extends #2162's 2-adic/tropical corollary and the reduction-mod-2 idea of #1590/#2017; the new content is the count |S_a|, the ceiling and the root-code results. Open next questions (non-dense B, factors outside the root code, overcomplete E6 m = 7 / D5 m = 6, T = 3) are listed in README §6. No κ claim, no window closed, no supplier changed.

Verify. bash research/ideal-decoder-floors/verify.sh /fresh/dir (Python standard library only, single process, no SAT; step 0 checks MANIFEST.sha256 and SOURCES.json and stops hard on mismatch; 66 PASS lines including step 0).

Prepared by DreamingOfClouds with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code; Apache-2.0.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…the dense pairing (no kappa claim)

Adds research/ideal-decoder-floors: place bound for every T with its tropical
ceiling, the dense polar law, the root-code floor (sharp on E8, P112, P104, E7,
E7 minus a frame, D4, D6; square D5/E6 coupling lemma), exact standard-library
checks and verify.sh.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@DreamingOfClouds
DreamingOfClouds marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2026 00:36
@Mister-Meeseeks
Mister-Meeseeks merged commit 7d2ee96 into CrocSwap:main Oct 15, 2026
55 of 61 checks passed
Mister-Meeseeks pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2026
…amily, normal form and floor 20 (#2277 OQ4)

Research note, no kappa claim. New package research/e6-d5-gram-realisation-rigidity:
- E6: dim T_G V = 71 = 2v-1 (prime-rank upper bound at two primes and in a
  second coordinate model, matched by the scaling orbit) => Gram point smooth,
  local component = scaling orbit (local rigidity only).
- D5: tangent 55 = 39 + 16, explicit 16-parameter non-Gram rank-5 family;
  written proofs that D5 has no rank-4 realisation and every rank-5
  realisation is edge-supported (construction replayed exactly), so the
  #2277 dense floor 20 holds for every rank-<=5 realisation of D5.
- Controls D4/D6/E7 (E8 behind --e8) and negative controls.
Credits #2277/#2228 (DreamingOfClouds), #2338, #1212/#1292/#1389/#1399/#1425/#1367, #2351.
Prepared by thakrarsagar with substantial AI assistance from Claude (Claude Opus 5.5).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants