Repository navigation
Independent verification (no new κ): record candidate #2269 T74 borrow43 — words, 437-helper fill and moment root reproduce; stale evidence, unpriced buffers, X2 open - #2315
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 15, 2026
Conversation
Fresh stdlib verification of PR CrocSwap#2269 head b479fc5 that imports and runs no PR code (40 inputs pinned by blob id and sha256): - words_check: both BORROW-WORD-43 words; 43 warps (G invertible, G span U = span E, K_G maps L_U to L_E, Fourier rank 0), nested frames, exact replay over Q<F_43> with arbitrary dirty registers (Y += X, all else and 76 buffers restored), recounted profiles and widths; unborrowed positive control. - fill_check: 291,042-role 437-helper owner fill, windows rebuilt from the event stream, families, bins and idle recount; T37 parent control. - price_check: profile composed from our recounts equals PROFILE.json; certified exact moment-root bracket (width 1e-130) contains claimed b. Everything claimed reproduces. Found: stale pre-borrow evidence (no admission receipt for the borrowed supplier), 76 unpriced cleanup zero buffers (eager peak 513 vs 480 fields), X2 unchecked, metadata errors. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 15, 2026
This was referenced Oct 15, 2026
Mister-Meeseeks
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2026
… PR2766 provenance, root-bracket precision - Occupancy: add controls C4c-C4f (extra-word lender 403, lender writes moved to the end of restore at frame FULL, a moved lender read) with machine-checked must-accept / exact-failing expectations. A lender write moved past its alias warp at FULL is accepted by both replays, the frame chain, recount, refits, fill and price; only OCC-TIMELINE (plus undeclared-edit checks) rejects it. Occupancy is therefore a conformance property, not a kappa-soundness condition, in the finite model; #2802 enforces it structurally in verify_retired7.py, #2818's patch check has no occupancy predicate (read, not run). Corrects the earlier "only frame monotonicity" wording. - Attribution: compare against PR2766's own pinned word (only B1151 differs); the other 19 frames #2802 lists with it are checked cost-neutral; the reconstructed retired5 state now matches #2802's recorded endpoint, local profile and fill sha256. - New rule S3-ABOVE-FLOOR-NEUTRAL: the seven above-floor refit5c frames carry no cost. - Root bracket: the 1e-70 slack was applied in the default 28-digit Decimal context, where it rounds away; widening now uses a 100-digit directed context, with a written error budget. Conclusions unchanged (margins >= 1.0e-20 in all four brackets). - Verifier emits prelude warp count, 35/14/14 split and refit7c dims; a pin mismatch prints a FAIL line. README adds "What this decides", terms, downstream claims #2824/#2827/#2833, credits (#2315, #2656, #2767, #2322), and Python-version scope. PASS_T74_RETIRED7_INCREMENT_AUDIT rules=28/28 controls=19/19 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Status: independent verification. The construction claims of record candidate #2269 reproduce, and no counterexample was found. Evidence, metadata and accounting defects are listed below. There is no new κ, no frontier change, and no endorsement of κ beyond what is checked here.
Object
#2269 (jeremykothe2, head
b479fc5567bc09ab9185bffe89b62594f36d74e5,research/gmx-t74-borrow43/) claims conditional κ = 0.0016962471390584742…, which is +1.4% over the selected record. It adds 43 borrowed-helper aliases from #2226 (Cinna Davis' anticipatory dirty borrowing) to the T74 pivot-566+554 words and re-fills the 666-call hosting.When this check started, nothing committed independently checked the new 437-helper fill. The shipped
evidence/INDEPENDENT.jsondescribes a different, pre-borrow 480-helper fill.What reproduces, using fresh stdlib code
The new code imports, executes and copies no code from #2269, #2226 or #2260. The longest shared token run against 19 PR scripts is 27 tokens. All 40 inputs are pinned by git blob id and sha256.
Words. For both
BORROW-WORD-43{base,extra}:{1:2351,2:501,3:414,4:129,5:42,8:8};{1:2339,2:509,3:418,4:125,5:42,8:8};{4:36,5:9,7:36,8:116,9:240}.Fill. For
OWNERS.json.gz, 291,042 rows:{1:23976,3:8673,5:813,7:150,48:24479}.Price.
PROFILE.json.complex_lower+ 1e-90 is rejected.Positive controls.
The gain attributable to borrowing is Δb = 1.64922·10⁻⁵ over #2044's b.
Defects and open obligations (none changes b as checked)
evidence/INDEPENDENT.json,evidence/ASSEMBLY.json,evidence/FULL-ADMISSION.json,PRICE.jsonand the top-levelSPEC.json.physical_stock_identityhas no buffer term. Improve conditional κ to 0.0016805 with selective dirty borrowing and physical owner repacking #2260 charged its buffers, and Research: 80-helper anticipatory borrowing component and exact price rejection (no new kappa) #2226 PROOF §4 lists this as open.CLAIM.jsonsetsconstruction_improvement: false;Not checked
Reproduce
This takes about 35 s.
--fetchfetchesrefs/pull/2269/headonly ifb479fc55is absent; every input is still verified against its pins. Expected last line:Checks run locally:
/tmp;research_package.py --check-onlypasses;test_research_*tests pass;Provenance and credit
0fdd7d82(priority revision 4), unchanged at submission (2026-10-15 04:53 UTC).independent-moment, refined.Prepared for Sagar Thakrar with substantial AI assistance (Claude Code, Anthropic). Separate agents wrote the three checks; two adversarial reviewers checked independence and coverage; the main session reran every command. Apache-2.0.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code