Index the ten review rounds published after the #1094 selection

[hikaru0706]

Change and mathematical scope

Navigation fix only; no construction, proof, certificate or κ change.

README.md and docs/research/current-status.md both stop at the batch1099 review. The ten integration rounds published after the #1094 selection (community-efficient100 … community-efficient1000, PRs through #2027, κ unchanged) are reachable only from autoresearch.md, the bottleneck brief and the priority log. A reader starting at the README or status page cannot tell that roughly 900 later PRs were reviewed.

• current-status.md: inside the current section (above the historical banner), a short Reviews since the Conditional kappa 0.001672660197076918: rare-pattern T16 exchanges #1094 selection paragraph and a table of the ten rounds with their frozen PR selections and merged/pending counts, copied from each review's header.
• README.md: a short pointer under the selected-result links to the review through Research: sharp mixed UT4 root tariffs with arbitrary dirty workspace #2027 and to that table.

No frozen review, receipt or historical section is edited.

Task and overlap

• Task: scope-navigation (track consolidation, scope key b18e0e173a4430a9564b, seed 4bde80ee48fd3e1474e27b2d419a41ed, catalogue revision 4). Scope unchanged.
• Base: 0fdd7d82de03e43c9e5a1000dfbcd380d1b687d2 (= origin/main at submission).
• Overlap: find_overlap.py --refresh timed out locally, so I checked open PRs touching README.md / current-status.md directly. docs(ci): bind current replay guidance to the selected record #2214 (CI guidance in docs/ci-verification.md), [Lean] Link an end-to-end proof of multiplication below n log n #2411 (Lean pointer in README) and Batch Discussion overlap reads with complete pagination #2493 (overlap-helper README section) edit different sections; none indexes the post-Conditional kappa 0.001672660197076918: rare-pattern T16 exchanges #1094 rounds.
• I confirmed from git history that all ten review files were added after community-batch1099-review.md.

Validation

python3 -B scripts/research_baseline.py   # PASS_RESEARCH_BASELINE_BINDINGS_ONLY
python3 -B -m unittest tests.test_research_current_status tests.test_research_onboarding tests.test_research_replay_selection   # 35 tests OK

• A first draft used a ## heading, which test_history_banner_precedes_historical_sections correctly rejected (it would end the current section before the banner). The final version uses a bold lead-in instead.
• All relative links in the two edited files resolve to existing files.
• Not run: full replays (documentation-only change) and hosted CI.

Credit

The indexed reviews and every contribution they record belong to their original authors and reviewers. Substantial AI assistance: the task was selected, investigated and written with Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5), then reviewed and submitted by me.

Open next questions

None justified for this change. Possible small follow-up: CONTRIBUTING.md still points pending-work readers to contribution-review.md, which is an Oct-8 historical triage index; it could point to the latest efficient review or the PR ledger instead.

Workflow feedback (optional)

scripts/find_overlap.py --refresh did not finish within 120 s here; #2493's batched discussion reads may address this.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code