Repository navigation
Research: audit later-stage selected BIT reserve composition - #2547
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 16, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Add
research/selected-bootstrap-reserve-composition/, an independent conditional audit and regression for later selected BIT bootstrap stages.The source-contract induction corroborates the existing reserve-composition argument. It inherits the conditional coefficient 6748 from #2120; it does not derive a new stock formula or admit an actual all-size implementation. The new finite regression distinguishes the individual return contract from an apparently correct completed wrapper endpoint.
Card
selected-stock-envelope, priority revision 4, refined to the later-stage completion implication rather than repeating first-stage headroom arithmetic. Scientific base is0fdd7d82de03e43c9e5a1000dfbcd380d1b687d2.Credit Rohan Arun / retained PR185 and PR387 for nested restoration, Adam Gall / #2084 at
8001a23b003bec5dff5e61edec907b652c475932for the conditional selected BIT implication, and Nick Petalas / #2120 at378593574261e0b0915e7e8a83147aa640274fc8for its coefficient refinement. Josie Elliston / #1956 and #1965, ToikY / #1990, and the selected supplier lineage retain credit. #2399 and #2457 address complementary callee/spectator obligations and are not admitted by this audit.Tested artifact
Evidence
After: the individual child-return regression rejects the exact trajectory
1, 2, 1, while valid nested wrappers pass. This is a countermodel to a weakened premise, not a selected-implementation bug report.Checked with CPython 3.12.15 on Linux x86_64 / WSL2. Actual all-width packet/compiler/callee completion, complete-spectator conversion, H2 uniform time, preparation, parking and precision remain assumptions. No full selected cold replay, new exponent or supplier admission is claimed.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way
Blast Radius: research
Only this opt-in package and its byte-pinned predecessor text are added. Selected records and frozen source inputs are unchanged. The composition conclusion is conditional, and the finite fixture is not a q-adic tape implementation.