Repository navigation
Research: one-repeat transfer-coupled (5,1,1) obstruction (no new kappa) - #2846
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 16, 2026
Conversation
Answers CrocSwap#2836 OQ1: every covering one-repeat transfer-coupled dual at shape (5,1,1) has R>=96 (tariff >=459 at X=0,C=1), strictly worse than distinct-label R=84 and unable to undercut the six-query endpoint 436. Prepared by Wentao Li with substantial AI assistance.
cursor Bot
pushed a commit
to VictorLiwentao/integer-mult-bounds
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2026
…kappa) Freestanding CrocSwap#840-style priced alphabet under PR1898 (b,a,x)=(38,2,2): every covering one-repeat long walk on partitioned independent dual (2,6) has exact R=112 (covering 59996160); tariff floor 528>436. Answers pending independent-walks-8q OQ1 without editing leave-alones through CrocSwap#2846. Prepared by Wentao Li with substantial AI assistance.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change and scope
Answers open question 1 of #2836 in the five-source common-B mutable-source alphabet of #1898: do non-distinct (one-repeat) label layers inside a transfer-coupled
(5,1,1)schedule improve on distinct-labelR=84?Every covering one-repeat dual has
R∈{96,98}. Combined minimum isR=96, strictly worse than the distinct-label floor84. Abstract tariff38·7+2·96+1=459>436already atX=0.Scoped obstruction / priced alphabet; no new kappa. Leave-alone through #2840 / #2836 / #2817 was not reopened.
Result
Package:
research/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q/.Tip:
90d879d143f9570c140d105a5cc60f445766d852.Exact: combined one-repeat min R 96 (tariff floor 459); no undercut of 436; does not beat distinct-label 84.
Validation
Expected:
Default verify is read-only. Admission uses
need();-Oalso passes. Requiresgccfor localdual.c(Python fallback available).Overlap and credit
Closest prior: #2836 (OQ1), #2817. Freestanding one-repeat layer; no competing open PR at refresh.
Credit the mutable-source / #2836 / #2817 / #2779 / PR1898 lineage. Prepared by Wentao Li (VictorLiwentao, @Is__Victor) with substantial AI assistance, under Apache-2.0.