Skip to content

Research: one-repeat transfer-coupled (5,1,1) obstruction (no new kappa) - #2846

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
VictorLiwentao:cursor/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q-60b9
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
VictorLiwentao:cursor/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q-60b9

Conversation

@VictorLiwentao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change and scope

Answers open question 1 of #2836 in the five-source common-B mutable-source alphabet of #1898: do non-distinct (one-repeat) label layers inside a transfer-coupled (5,1,1) schedule improve on distinct-label R=84?

Layer Covering pairs Exact min R Tariff at X=0,C=1 Undercuts 436? Beats distinct 84?
Distinct-label (#2836 / #2817) 8749440 84 ≥439 (needs X≥2) no —
Prefix-internal double 2499840 98 463 no no
Suffix–prefix collision 1666560 96 459 no no
Combined one-repeat 4166400 96 459 no no

Every covering one-repeat dual has R∈{96,98}. Combined minimum is R=96, strictly worse than the distinct-label floor 84. Abstract tariff 38·7+2·96+1=459>436 already at X=0.

Scoped obstruction / priced alphabet; no new kappa. Leave-alone through #2840 / #2836 / #2817 was not reopened.

Result

Package: research/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q/.
Tip: 90d879d143f9570c140d105a5cc60f445766d852.

Exact: combined one-repeat min R 96 (tariff floor 459); no undercut of 436; does not beat distinct-label 84.

Validation

python3.12 -I -B research/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q/verify.py
python3.12 -I -O -B research/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q/verify.py
python3.12 -I -B research/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q/independent.py
python3.12 -I -B research/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q/test_package.py
python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q

Expected:

PASS_TRANSFER_COUPLED_ONEREPEAT_7Q_OBSTRUCTION combined_min_R=96 ... tariff_floor=459 ... answers_all_shapes_oq1_onerepeat no_new_kappa
PASS_INDEPENDENT_TRANSFER_COUPLED_ONEREPEAT_7Q ... tariff_floor=459 ... no_new_kappa
PASS_TRANSFER_COUPLED_ONEREPEAT_7Q_PACKAGE_TESTS groups=6
PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE research/transfer-coupled-onerepeat-7q outcome=completed

Default verify is read-only. Admission uses need(); -O also passes. Requires gcc for local dual.c (Python fallback available).

Overlap and credit

Closest prior: #2836 (OQ1), #2817. Freestanding one-repeat layer; no competing open PR at refresh.

Credit the mutable-source / #2836 / #2817 / #2779 / PR1898 lineage. Prepared by Wentao Li (VictorLiwentao, @Is__Victor) with substantial AI assistance, under Apache-2.0.

Answers CrocSwap#2836 OQ1: every covering one-repeat transfer-coupled dual at shape
(5,1,1) has R>=96 (tariff >=459 at X=0,C=1), strictly worse than distinct-label
R=84 and unable to undercut the six-query endpoint 436.

Prepared by Wentao Li with substantial AI assistance.
cursor Bot pushed a commit to VictorLiwentao/integer-mult-bounds that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2026
…kappa)

Freestanding CrocSwap#840-style priced alphabet under PR1898 (b,a,x)=(38,2,2):
every covering one-repeat long walk on partitioned independent dual (2,6)
has exact R=112 (covering 59996160); tariff floor 528>436. Answers pending
independent-walks-8q OQ1 without editing leave-alones through CrocSwap#2846.

Prepared by Wentao Li with substantial AI assistance.
@Mister-Meeseeks
Mister-Meeseeks merged commit 9f3adba into CrocSwap:main Oct 16, 2026
40 of 61 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants