Skip to content

Two-sided deficiency budget: Theorem BX for b_Q <= 4 (conditional frame, exact residue, no κ claim) - #3029

Open
DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
DreamingOfClouds:research/two-sided-deficiency-budget
Open

DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
DreamingOfClouds:research/two-sided-deficiency-budget

Conversation

@DreamingOfClouds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds research/two-sided-deficiency-budget/ only; nothing existing is changed. Pure finite combinatorics on the E8 root lines and the unit P112, in the line of #2816, #2826, #2862, #2832 (kill-shot reduction), the LC / O4 lineage and #2985 (ours). No κ claim, no window, no supplier word.

What is proven or checked (README claims box, each row names its proof or verify.sh step)

  • Unified budget: |Lo| = ρ + b_Q + dep_Q, so Λ_Q <= 6t + 6 dep_Q − (Σσ − 6 b_Q); Budget BX is Σσ >= 6 b_Q. The combined cost bound that uses it is stated as conditional on G2-BUDGET P2.
  • Dependencies at tight m: every q-dependency is X2^T α (normal-form hypotheses rank Ŷ = 8+t, rank X2 = s stated); the α-merge product identity. The induction down to Decoder floors, case (b) for every number of terms: one-sided P112 decoders cost ≥ 64 without corrections (unique optimum) and with ≤ 2 non-full corrections (no κ claim) #2816 is conditional on the one-sided floor beyond Δ <= 2 (proven there for Δ <= 2 / <= 2 non-full corrections) and on re-normalising D_α.
  • Theorem BX (size version): generalised Hamming weights d_1 = 53, d_2 = 78, d_3.. >= 92, 100, 106, 109, 111, 112, the deletion lemma, and the deficit table; BX holds for b_Q <= 2 at every t <= 6, b_Q = 3 for t <= 5, b_Q = 4 for t <= 3.
  • Exact supports close (b_Q,t) = (3,6), (4,4), (4,5), (4,6): BX for b_Q <= 4 at every t <= 6. Two independent implementations (the audit scripts checks/audit/chk1-8.py as primary; the cover-oracle scripts in checks/rb/ as second); (4,6) is killed directly over all 112 non-frame roots with no orbit reduction.
  • Remark: BX and the dependency analysis do not use Theorem DR; any combination with DR needs the shared-swap-line term or |S_a| <= 2.

Open, exactly: b_Q >= 5; R-dep (a fully-low J_P-circuit at tight m); tight m with s + t <= 7; and the two imports not proven here (G2-BUDGET P2; the one-sided floor beyond Δ <= 2).

Reproduce: bash research/two-sided-deficiency-budget/verify.sh (numpy >= 2; two processes; manifest, root-system facts, constants, the audit scripts, the optimiser, the second implementation). The one cited classical input is the conjugacy of Φ ∩ V to a standard parabolic subsystem (Bourbaki VI §1; Humphreys 1.12).

Prepared by DreamingOfClouds with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code; Apache-2.0.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…me, exact residue, no kappa claim)

Adds research/two-sided-deficiency-budget/ with README (claims box, proofs), verify.sh (about 6 minutes, 42 assertions), two independent implementations of the exact checks, and MANIFEST.sha256.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant