Repository navigation
Two-sided deficiency budget: Theorem BX for b_Q <= 4 (conditional frame, exact residue, no κ claim) - #3029
Open
DreamingOfClouds wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…me, exact residue, no kappa claim) Adds research/two-sided-deficiency-budget/ with README (claims box, proofs), verify.sh (about 6 minutes, 42 assertions), two independent implementations of the exact checks, and MANIFEST.sha256. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 16, 2026
Open
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds
research/two-sided-deficiency-budget/only; nothing existing is changed. Pure finite combinatorics on the E8 root lines and the unit P112, in the line of #2816, #2826, #2862, #2832 (kill-shot reduction), the LC / O4 lineage and #2985 (ours). No κ claim, no window, no supplier word.What is proven or checked (README claims box, each row names its proof or
verify.shstep)|Lo| = ρ + b_Q + dep_Q, soΛ_Q <= 6t + 6 dep_Q − (Σσ − 6 b_Q); Budget BX isΣσ >= 6 b_Q. The combined cost bound that uses it is stated as conditional on G2-BUDGET P2.m: every q-dependency isX2^T α(normal-form hypothesesrank Ŷ = 8+t,rank X2 = sstated); the α-merge product identity. The induction down to Decoder floors, case (b) for every number of terms: one-sided P112 decoders cost ≥ 64 without corrections (unique optimum) and with ≤ 2 non-full corrections (no κ claim) #2816 is conditional on the one-sided floor beyondΔ <= 2(proven there forΔ <= 2/<= 2non-full corrections) and on re-normalisingD_α.d_1 = 53,d_2 = 78,d_3.. >= 92, 100, 106, 109, 111, 112, the deletion lemma, and the deficit table; BX holds forb_Q <= 2at everyt <= 6,b_Q = 3fort <= 5,b_Q = 4fort <= 3.(b_Q,t) = (3,6), (4,4), (4,5), (4,6): BX forb_Q <= 4at everyt <= 6. Two independent implementations (the audit scriptschecks/audit/chk1-8.pyas primary; the cover-oracle scripts inchecks/rb/as second);(4,6)is killed directly over all 112 non-frame roots with no orbit reduction.|S_a| <= 2.Open, exactly:
b_Q >= 5; R-dep (a fully-lowJ_P-circuit at tightm); tightmwiths + t <= 7; and the two imports not proven here (G2-BUDGET P2; the one-sided floor beyondΔ <= 2).Reproduce:
bash research/two-sided-deficiency-budget/verify.sh(numpy >= 2; two processes; manifest, root-system facts, constants, the audit scripts, the optimiser, the second implementation). The one cited classical input is the conjugacy ofΦ ∩ Vto a standard parabolic subsystem (Bourbaki VI §1; Humphreys 1.12).Prepared by DreamingOfClouds with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code; Apache-2.0.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code