Repository navigation
κ = 8.01598358635541e-4: #352 with Design T + twins on a reordered-design p10b base word (+0.064%) - #353
Draft
rohanarun wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
κ = 8.01598358635541e-4: #352 with Design T + twins on a reordered-design p10b base word (+0.064%)#353rohanarun wants to merge 3 commits into
rohanarun wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
… the complex supplier; kappa = 8.01083628465007e-4
…-design p10b base; kappa = 8.01598358635541e-4 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TGoMCHAqctZe4wtb4qr7vv
The "Verify research artifacts" workflow (make joint-dual-verify) fails on main and on every open pull request since the root Makefile and README changed (AssertionError: Makefile in joint_dual_compose.check_sources). Regenerated with scripts/experiments/pin_joint_dual_sources.py; verify_joint_dual.py and tests/test_joint_reclaim.py pass (16 tests) under Python 3.11. The joint-dual certificates only change in their recorded source-manifest hash. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> (cherry picked from commit a45747d)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Conditional κ = 801598358635541/10¹⁸ ≈ 8.01598358635541e-4 — +5.15e-7 (+0.064 %) over #352 (8.01083628465007e-4).
Stacked on #352 (DaysSky). The complex supplier is unchanged: #352's Sussman E8 unit, b ≈ 8.7625e-4. The bit side binds.
Only the bit word changes. The base is #325's p10b word, regenerated by #325's own producer with two knobs changed:
['A',0,0]is created last;producer/local_design_p10_reordered.json);That moves the base bit root from 7.70277e-4 to 7.70779e-4. #346's Design T and twin condensation are then applied unchanged, with one exception: twin condensation keeps 470 of the 471 eligible planes, so that the entrance residual sum stays ≡ 0 mod 5 (exact width-100 / 60-replica bank tiling).
Checks run so far: the Design T verifier (legality: 0 violations, 0 degenerate frames, exact F2 restoration) and the bit coarse saving from both rational engines with the 1e-16 fallback. #315's outer assembly gives 47 strict constraints, all positive, and rejects the adjacent grid point.
Draft: the full
verify.shreplay (#266 checkers, exact frames, primes, banks, complex guard) is running, and I'll post the PASS line here.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01TGoMCHAqctZe4wtb4qr7vv