Repository navigation
Conditional κ = 0.001308501945841842: kernel79 complex supplier under #471's footprint rule at nine stages, with #493's bit word (+0.38%) - #500
Draft
rohanarun wants to merge 11 commits into
Conversation
…375517e-3 Both E8 suppliers of CrocSwap#434 keep their local words. Whole dirty-helper residuals move from bank streams onto pending idle-advance coordinates of data families that are untouched between the hosting invocation and the advance. Bit c 1.239085e-3, complex b 1.267453e-3, kappa 618775866623647/5e17 (+9.22% over CrocSwap#434). Fresh CrocSwap#434 replay, independent audit with nine mutation controls, two exact moments, fresh invoices and all 47 outer inequalities.
…rance gauges on whole-residual hosting Adds research/e8-complex-gauge-kernel (on PR442's tree) and its CI workflow. Conditional on Lemma G (reduced to CrocSwap#425 + CrocSwap#471/CrocSwap#458 plus a schedule lemma) and CrocSwap#458's paid adapters. Independent audit and light checks passed; heavy full replays pending. Prepared by DreamingOfClouds with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ions) The Lemma G summary pinned sha256 of runtime-written .gz files, whose container bytes depend on the zlib bundled with the Python in use, so the Python 3.12 full run failed EXPECTED while 3.14 passed. Hash the decompressed JSON instead (keys without .gz); regenerate those 8 EXPECTED fields and MANIFEST.json. Full fresh-copy runs pass on Python 3.14 (--all --discover-check) and 3.12 (--all). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…rocSwap#471's footprint rule at nine stages, with CrocSwap#493's bit word (+0.38%) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TGoMCHAqctZe4wtb4qr7vv
The "Verify research artifacts" workflow (make joint-dual-verify) fails on main and on every open pull request since the root Makefile and README changed (AssertionError: Makefile in joint_dual_compose.check_sources). Regenerated with scripts/experiments/pin_joint_dual_sources.py; verify_joint_dual.py and tests/test_joint_reclaim.py pass (16 tests) under Python 3.11. The joint-dual certificates only change in their recorded source-manifest hash. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> (cherry picked from commit a45747d)
This was referenced Oct 11, 2026
Mister-Meeseeks
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2026
- Model: units are physical streams (family, cover class) as in #442/#458 and the template's route_semantics. New LemmaA/Streams.lean: streamOwner_injective(_of_disjoint), sweep_unique, lemmaA_streams (one owner per stream from disjoint footprints on shared families); plus lemmaA_piece and lemmaA_async (Lemma A feeding #505's window variant). - code/check_owners.py rewritten for stream units (data wires alone, disjoint footprints on shared families, centre copies in distinct private slots, atomic calls; 3 mutants): all four #484 words pass, including the 32 gauge80 / 16 kernel79 slot-sharing calls and the anchor. - code/check_windows.py (new, independent): every hosted block inside its pending child's open window, blocks disjoint, family-group windows disjoint (2 mutants); all four words and #505's emitted async template. - verify.py: runs Lemma G's check_extended_labels.py ((F) is read in the extended labels), fails on a missing LEMMA-A.json, checks I-helper counts against EXPECTED, prints the owner and window results; --async T.json.gz. - Docs: unit model stated, coverage per word, #505 replay results and what is not re-run, commutative-semiring wording, credits #433/#442/#500. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Conditional κ = 654250972920921/(5·10¹⁷) = 0.001308501945841842, +0.3814 % over #493 (0.001303530097714685). The result is complex-bound with #493's R489 bit word. It uses only interfaces that #493's own κ already relies on: no Lemma G, no cross-copy.
The complex endpoint is b = 0.001310216366506891. For comparison:
Conditional variant (#484's Lemma G):
Change
This takes #484's nine-stage pipeline: #449's kernel79 word, paid wrappers, explicit spectators and banks. It replaces #458's one-helper-per-family hosting rule with #471's footprint rule (Dugongue), the admission behind #471's complex supplier that #493 cites. Several helpers of one invocation may share a host family when their full nine-coordinate footprints (residual cells plus explicit spectators) are pairwise disjoint.
For a copy of an idle child of rank r, the capacity is:
This is #471's inequality set with 73 in place of 89.
Kernel79 under the footprint rule:
Our model reproduces #484's one-owner kernel79 b exactly before the rule change.
Package
research/complex-footprint-kernel/is a copy of #484'se8-complex-gauge-kernelwith these additions:code/footprint_gk.py;--footprintpaths in the hosting generator, the independent hosting audit and the variant runner;Checks run here
The full
verify.py(anchor, both words, Lemma G check stage, assembly) is running now. Its receipt and EXPECTED.json will follow in a commit and a comment. CI is not claimed.Scope
Review point: #471's footprint admission at nine stages, used here with #458/#484's paid wrappers. As in #471, every simultaneous footprint is disjoint, and spectators are explicit and restored by the whole-invocation identity.
All other inherited interfaces (all-size compiler, hosting, restored work, analytic) remain. No unconditional theorem is claimed.
Credits
Footprint hosting, selection and packaging by Rohan Arun with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01TGoMCHAqctZe4wTb4Qr7VV