Skip to content

Conditional κ = 0.001308501945841842: kernel79 complex supplier under #471's footprint rule at nine stages, with #493's bit word (+0.38%) - #500

Draft
rohanarun wants to merge 11 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
rohanarun:research/complex-footprint-kernel
Draft

rohanarun wants to merge 11 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
rohanarun:research/complex-footprint-kernel

Conversation

@rohanarun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Conditional κ = 654250972920921/(5·10¹⁷) = 0.001308501945841842, +0.3814 % over #493 (0.001303530097714685). The result is complex-bound with #493's R489 bit word. It uses only interfaces that #493's own κ already relies on: no Lemma G, no cross-copy.

The complex endpoint is b = 0.001310216366506891. For comparison:

Conditional variant (#484's Lemma G):

Change

This takes #484's nine-stage pipeline: #449's kernel79 word, paid wrappers, explicit spectators and banks. It replaces #458's one-helper-per-family hosting rule with #471's footprint rule (Dugongue), the admission behind #471's complex supplier that #493 cites. Several helpers of one invocation may share a host family when their full nine-coordinate footprints (residual cells plus explicit spectators) are pairwise disjoint.

For a copy of an idle child of rank r, the capacity is:

  • Σw ≤ r;
  • 9k ≤ 73;
  • Σ(9 − w) ≤ 73 − r.

This is #471's inequality set with 73 in place of 89.

Kernel79 under the footprint rule:

  • 286 width-9 banks;
  • live stock 7,966;
  • max child 8;
  • deficit 2,496.

Our model reproduces #484's one-owner kernel79 b exactly before the rule change.

Package

research/complex-footprint-kernel/ is a copy of #484's e8-complex-gauge-kernel with these additions:

Checks run here

The full verify.py (anchor, both words, Lemma G check stage, assembly) is running now. Its receipt and EXPECTED.json will follow in a commit and a comment. CI is not claimed.

python -B research/complex-footprint-kernel/verify.py /absolute/new/output

Scope

Review point: #471's footprint admission at nine stages, used here with #458/#484's paid wrappers. As in #471, every simultaneous footprint is disjoint, and spectators are explicit and restored by the whole-invocation identity.

All other inherited interfaces (all-size compiler, hosting, restored work, analytic) remain. No unconditional theorem is claimed.

Credits

Footprint hosting, selection and packaging by Rohan Arun with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01TGoMCHAqctZe4wTb4Qr7VV

icekylinx and others added 11 commits October 11, 2026 19:54
…375517e-3

Both E8 suppliers of CrocSwap#434 keep their local words. Whole dirty-helper
residuals move from bank streams onto pending idle-advance coordinates
of data families that are untouched between the hosting invocation
and the advance. Bit c 1.239085e-3, complex b 1.267453e-3, kappa
618775866623647/5e17 (+9.22% over CrocSwap#434). Fresh CrocSwap#434 replay, independent
audit with nine mutation controls, two exact moments, fresh invoices
and all 47 outer inequalities.
…rance gauges on whole-residual hosting

Adds research/e8-complex-gauge-kernel (on PR442's tree) and its CI workflow.
Conditional on Lemma G (reduced to CrocSwap#425 + CrocSwap#471/CrocSwap#458 plus a schedule lemma)
and CrocSwap#458's paid adapters. Independent audit and light checks passed; heavy
full replays pending.
Prepared by DreamingOfClouds with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ions)

The Lemma G summary pinned sha256 of runtime-written .gz files, whose
container bytes depend on the zlib bundled with the Python in use, so
the Python 3.12 full run failed EXPECTED while 3.14 passed. Hash the
decompressed JSON instead (keys without .gz); regenerate those 8
EXPECTED fields and MANIFEST.json. Full fresh-copy runs pass on
Python 3.14 (--all --discover-check) and 3.12 (--all).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…rocSwap#471's footprint rule at nine stages, with CrocSwap#493's bit word (+0.38%)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TGoMCHAqctZe4wtb4qr7vv
The "Verify research artifacts" workflow (make joint-dual-verify) fails on main
and on every open pull request since the root Makefile and README changed
(AssertionError: Makefile in joint_dual_compose.check_sources). Regenerated with
scripts/experiments/pin_joint_dual_sources.py; verify_joint_dual.py and
tests/test_joint_reclaim.py pass (16 tests) under Python 3.11. The joint-dual
certificates only change in their recorded source-manifest hash.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
(cherry picked from commit a45747d)
Mister-Meeseeks pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2026
- Model: units are physical streams (family, cover class) as in #442/#458
  and the template's route_semantics. New LemmaA/Streams.lean:
  streamOwner_injective(_of_disjoint), sweep_unique, lemmaA_streams (one
  owner per stream from disjoint footprints on shared families); plus
  lemmaA_piece and lemmaA_async (Lemma A feeding #505's window variant).
- code/check_owners.py rewritten for stream units (data wires alone,
  disjoint footprints on shared families, centre copies in distinct private
  slots, atomic calls; 3 mutants): all four #484 words pass, including the
  32 gauge80 / 16 kernel79 slot-sharing calls and the anchor.
- code/check_windows.py (new, independent): every hosted block inside its
  pending child's open window, blocks disjoint, family-group windows
  disjoint (2 mutants); all four words and #505's emitted async template.
- verify.py: runs Lemma G's check_extended_labels.py ((F) is read in the
  extended labels), fails on a missing LEMMA-A.json, checks I-helper counts
  against EXPECTED, prints the owner and window results; --async T.json.gz.
- Docs: unit model stated, coverage per word, #505 replay results and
  what is not re-run, commutative-semiring wording, credits #433/#442/#500.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants