Repository navigation
Conditional κ = 0.001620246754858718: improved owner map for the PR604 cold-ended witness - #607
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…604 cold-ended witness
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Conditional κ = 0.001620246754858718. This is +9.97e-8 over PR604 (0.001620147045734211). The conservative model gives 0.001620246751982763.
This PR is DreamingOfClouds' PR604 (
complex-571-cold14: 14 cold factory-scratch helpers per call ending at 4-dimensional frames, on our PR601 witness) with an improved literal owner map only. Dispatch is unchanged: ck ×44, atm3 ×22, jp8 ×6. A depth-2 ejection-chain polish of PR604's map changes the idle remainders, which the concave moment cost rewards. Against PR604's package, onlydata/OWNERS.json.gz,data/PLAN.json(windows and profile) anddata/SPEC.json(expected values) differ. All construction code,cold_endand every other step, controls, proofs and the verifier are PR604's, byte for byte. The package directory is renamedcomplex-571-cold14-j1so it doesn't collide with PR604's, and README, NOTICE andverify.shname it accordingly.All of PR604's soundness argument applies unchanged: Lean via #593/#599 (
hpe_word_multi,exact_cold), exact (N) checks for every (0, U_b) pair, the guarded refactored cleanup, and wrapper-order enforcement. An owner map only changes which helper sits in which owner slot. PR604's strict physical owner audit, invoice and assembly re-check that from scratch.Verification
research/complex-571-cold14-j1/verify.sh /tmp/complex-571-cold14-j1 .. # SOURCE_ROOT holds worktrees pr568 pr569 pr571 pr575 pr583 at the pinned commitsLocal result (Windows, CPython 3.11.11): the commit was preflighted from a fresh clone first (committed blobs equal the MANIFEST, every file LF, pin check passes). The official run from that clean clone of
ddd81bcthen gavePASS_COLD14_NATIVE_COMPLEX_AND_CITED_BIT, κ 0.001620246754858718, 55/55 stages exit 0, 478 s, with no reused baseline or locals. The receipt records MANIFEST sha256 d3196098…, equal to the committed MANIFEST.GitHub CI has not run, and I make no claim about it.
Declarative inputs
Unlike our PR591–PR603, this package doesn't yet ship
data/WITNESS.json,data/EXPECTED.jsonordata/cand.json, because our witness tools don't yet support PR604'scold_endstep. Those files will follow as a separate commit on this PR, after their own official verify.Credits
cold_end, verifier changes and package), PR599, PR509 and PR516 (Lean).AI disclosure and authorship: Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), running in the omp coding harness, found this owner map and prepared the PR. Jeremy Kothe (jeremykothe2) directed and reviewed it and is submitting it.
Scope
The result is conditional on the inherited all-size compiler, common-label/mutable-source realization, whole-call hosting, precision/tape/exact recovery, analytic transfer and the bit H1–H5 assumptions. It inherits PR604's draft status: PR604's own heavy verification was still running when this was opened. It is finite exact evidence, not an unconditional theorem, a complete Lean proof, or a practical speedup.