Repository navigation
Prove sharp nearest-even Walsh-stage error (no new kappa) - #6129
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 28, 2026
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 28, 2026
Contributor
|
I audited this PR independently in #6140 and found no error. I checked PROOF.md step by step at One clarification may be worth adding to the README. The Walsh law holds for any parity tie-break, since ties-to-odd gives the same a_J. The #6119 application, however, needs ties-to-even specifically. Under ties-to-odd, the (AI-assisted audit: Claude Opus 5.5, plus a read-only Codex review.) |
Mister-Meeseeks
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2026
…ngines reproduce a_J, the odd-output split and #6119's 3h/4 (no new κ) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Prove the sharp deterministic nearest-even error for J distinct normalized Walsh stages on a common grid h:
Claim type: scoped mathematical proof with exact finite corroboration. The coefficient is smaller for every J>=2 and its ratio to the old bound tends to 2/3. This is a logical precision result, with no new kappa or selected-frontier change.
CubeJerry's #6119 reports 3/16 on a finite input cube for its two-phase quantizer at h=1/4. The new all-grid application proves that 3/16 is its exact global normalized error, with sharp raw error 3/4. The main contribution is the all-J parity recurrence and attaining family, beyond the predecessor's finite observation. Produced by Nick Petalas; retain CubeJerry, Vlado Vojdanovski, JoyboyBrian and the credited source lineage.
Package:
research/nearest-even-walsh-error. Base721c03822c421b7f7fcbb2598993b947c4d88419; contributionf496734450c346468c66818c1c35521165b0cdda.Evidence
Exact reproduction from the repository root:
Substitute another CPython 3.12 interpreter on a different machine. Expected scientific status:
PASS_NEAREST_EVEN_WALSH_ERRORin both modes; registered status:PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE.Limitations and unrun obligations
The proof requires grid inputs, distinct Walsh axes, nearest-even ties, exact pre-rounding sums/differences and sufficient range. Off-grid data and other tie rules have explicit counterexamples. Arbitrary faults, interleaved non-Walsh gates, repeated axes and complex Gaussian butterflies are outside scope.
This supplies neither an emitted accelerated recursive child nor a physical cost, overflow, reversible-history or disposal contract. All five framework assumptions remain. No selected/native cold replay, Lean, Docker, independent human or formal proof-kernel verification was run or claimed. The selected metadata orientation passed; it is not scientific supplier admission.
Open next questions
Related open work
The completion refresh read the titles and bodies of all eleven other open account PRs created since the advance CLAIM: #6121 through #6128 and #6130 through #6132. They study class-specific defect guards, query capacity, centre kernels, sampler services, leaf laws, Gaussian row bounds, dyadic gauges and cut58 characters. None studies this Walsh quantizer or reports a competing value for the two-phase instance. No additional mathematical computation was run to compare their results.
CI notes
Uncertified by CI. At commit
f496734450c346468c66818c1c35521165b0cdda, run 40693335458 failed itsplanjob in the onboarding helper tests. The package replay was skipped and did not run in CI. Both scientific modes and the publication/export checks passed locally, but this hosted run certified none of those scientific checks. A maintainer re-run is needed after main is fixed.The exact cause is the selected-record/documentation mismatch on current main
721c03822c421b7f7fcbb2598993b947c4d88419. That PR6030 kappa-admission commit was pushed with[skip ci]and updated the selected record without matching the onboarding documents:test_research_current_status.CurrentStatusTests.test_current_section_matches_selected_recordexpects the literal**0.003125804**indocs/research/current-status.md. The document instead bolds the longer expression0.003125804 = 781451/250000000, so the exact substring assertion fails.test_research_current_status.CurrentCiNavigationTests.test_current_ci_section_matches_selected_recordexpectsmake frontier6030-verifyindocs/ci.md, which still describes Raise conditional kappa to 0.00310045 with independent helper splits #5599 andmake frontier5599-verify.The same two failures occur in PR #6120's run 40691776027, confirmed from its failed-job log. The completed PR checks were read once. This contribution changes neither failing document nor the selected record. Its local passing evidence remains separate from the missing CI certification.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way.
Blast Radius: isolated.
Adds only six files in a new research package and an explicit bounded replay registration. Shared code, frozen evidence, predecessor credit and the selected record are unchanged.