Repository navigation
Research note: restored DATA-shear boundaries for PR #521's native BIT query (exact query costs, no new κ) - #677
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 14, 2026
Conversation
Adds research/native-fusion-restored-shear/. It gives three restored DATA-shear implementations for the unipotent ADDRESS permutation of PR CrocSwap#521 (head a190fdb), with complete local cost recurrences, scoped query lower bounds and an exact checker. No new kappa: the selected certificate and upstream/ are unchanged. Sprint track: recursive interfaces, OS assignment seed 57, base 66849e1. Submitted by @commdata2338. Prepared with substantial AI assistance: OpenAI Codex (GPT-6-Astra) wrote the analysis, proof and checker, and Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5) packaged the submission. No independent human peer review is claimed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X86sCSXdoDd61SDFfC1PKG
Contributor
|
Integrated at Completed fixed-h DATA shear: two target queries, four private-only dirty queries, or one owned-disposable query. Laurent determinant and projector classification reviewed, complete finite checks passed. Typed recurrences are not self-recursion. The scoped package check passed at |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change and mathematical scope
Status: research note with exact verification. No new κ. The selected certificate, its κ (
51110230636731/31250000000000000) andupstream/are unchanged. All files are new, underresearch/native-fusion-restored-shear/.For the unipotent ADDRESS permutation
hof #521 (Karl Appel / @applecrusher, heada190fdb39f31647fc6f651625353710624627348), this completes the DATA shear(x,y,z) -> (x XOR y XOR h(y), y, z)under three explicit workspace contracts:h, arbitrary-dirty-row XOR model.Predecessor work. Details and pins are in NOTICE.md and SOURCES.json.
Open obligations.
No saving is inferred from the local counts.
Research note, proof, attribution, source pins, and completed local claim.
Overlap. No pinned coordination issue existed at either check. The pre-submission refresh covered 494 open PRs and found none on #521's restored shear. The nearest are #663, which audits #628's nonlinear dirty restoration, and #665, which prices a width-9 spectral split. Both study different objects.
Validation
From the repository root (Python 3.10+, standard library only):
Output, re-run on base
66849e1before submission:(Z/3)^6.make selected-record-checkpasses:PASS selected record, exact kappa, original source inventory and proof supplement: 51110230636731/31250000000000000.git diff --checkis clean, and no existing file orupstream/byte changes. The replay takes about 1.2 seconds on Linux with Python 3.12.3, standard library only.Sprint: recursive-interfaces track, OS seed 57. The claim and its result update are recorded in CLAIM.md.
Submitted by @commdata2338 with substantial AI assistance, under Apache-2.0: OpenAI Codex (GPT-6-Astra) wrote the analysis, proof and checker, and Claude Code packaged the submission. No independent human peer review is claimed.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code