Skip to content

Research audit: exclude five bootstrap levels at PR387’s grid point - #768

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
BagMan9:audit/seed73-bootstrap-depth
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
BagMan9:audit/seed73-bootstrap-depth

Conversation

@BagMan9

@BagMan9 BagMan9 commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR #387 checks that five bootstrap levels miss its κ at the published slack values. This scoped mathematical audit / negative result excludes all five-level choices in the retained recurrence accounting, allowing independent savings at every level and relaxing them up to the certified coarse-root upper endpoint. No new κ is claimed.

For the fixed starting saving a0=384599/10^10, the uniform envelope is A_j=u-u^j(u-a0), with compact-margin ceiling A_j/(1+A_j). Exact arithmetic places the five-level ceiling below #387's κ by between 0.546434 and 0.546435 units of 10^-18. The published six-level compact margin clears it by between 0.406 and 0.407 such units. Five levels would require an initial saving greater than 0.0005869935357213085... even in the optimistic envelope; a stronger-supplier control demonstrates that boundary.

All additions are confined to research/bootstrap-depth-audit/: written uniform proof, immutable source excerpts with SHA256/Git-blob pins and original notices, exact deterministic receipt, standard-library verifier, tests, local sprint claim and validation record. The verifier imports no predecessor implementation.

Reproduce from the repository root:

python3 -I -B -O research/bootstrap-depth-audit/verify.py --check research/bootstrap-depth-audit/EXPECTED.json

Expected: PASS_SCOPED_BOOTSTRAP_DEPTH_AUDIT; depths 0..5 excluded; six-round margin admitted; 9 controls rejected.

Validation on Linux x86_64 / Python 3.13.15: exact receipt matched; all seven additional tests passed, including 1,536 varying-savings schedules evaluated from the original cost exponents, 2,400 strict-grid cases, and optimized-process rejection of altered sources/receipts. All ten source files match the pinned Git bytes. python3 -B scripts/verify_selected_result.py and diff checks pass. make is unavailable, so the selected-record target's exact Python recipe was run directly. Full supplier/moment/47-constraint replays and repository-wide verification were not rerun; no remote CI pass is claimed.

The moment bracket and completed ordinary-supplier/row/restoration/tape/analytic interfaces remain inherited. This is a ceiling on certificates produced by the retained accounting, not an algorithmic runtime lower bound or a full multiplication proof. The six-level check covers the compact margin and recurrence gaps, not the whole construction. upstream/ and the selected #626/#543 frontier are unchanged.

Base: 66849e1475c930fd7732b1a0067ffee7e1e95f60. Audited #387 head: d9fb9410b1ae6f6ada376a1e7fd12bc176e476ea. Assignment seed 73. No pinned coordination issue existed. The final pre-submission snapshot covered 586 open PRs through #767 and found no matching depth audit. Ahrazzle's earlier reported three-round replay/assembly comparisons are credited; this adds a continuous variable-savings ceiling and starting-supplier threshold. #657's broad assembly wall is distinct and not a dependency.

Credit Rohan Arun's #185/#387, Chafik Boukhalfa's #384 supplier lineage, eumemic's #315 outer engine, icekylinx, Zhihao Chen, RaD/hipotures and the preserved source notices. Contribution by Isaac Grannis (@BagMan9), with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance. Apache-2.0. No separate human or delegated-agent review is claimed.

@Mister-Meeseeks
Mister-Meeseeks merged commit 0dc28e2 into CrocSwap:main Oct 14, 2026
@Mister-Meeseeks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

100-PR batch review at 57d8fbf2577bd4463834484264f980e0a7845824.

Merged to main, preserving the original contributor commits and package attribution.

Reviewed scope: Bootstrap depth diagnostic for fixed suppliers and stated recurrence: five levels excluded in recorded domain, six feasible; no universal depth barrier.

The pinned scoped command passed; the batch ledger contains its command, input hashes, environment and log. This incorporates the research/tooling contribution and does not change the selected κ or discharge the inherited multiplication-theorem assumptions.

Batch review, attribution and evidence. Thank you for the contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants