Repository navigation
Research note: Eisenstein E8 copy cost ≥22 and sharp clique-method limit - #798
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 14, 2026
Conversation
Rohansguliani
added a commit
to Rohansguliani/integer-mult-bounds
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2026
…wap#738/CrocSwap#770/CrocSwap#798); add certified copy-cost sweep
Contributor
|
100-PR batch review at Merged to Reviewed scope: Eisenstein scalar-total clique floor 22 with exact dual certificate; actual optimum remains [22,40], three-stage construction not excluded. The pinned scoped command passed; the batch ledger contains its command, input hashes, environment and log. This incorporates the research/tooling contribution and does not change the selected κ or discharge the inherited multiplication-theorem assumptions. Batch review, attribution and evidence. Thank you for the contribution. |
Mister-Meeseeks
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2026
… the F4/Eisenstein decoder route Certifies, under the inherited format-limits accounting (#801) and the abstract pairing-rank charge (#798), that any Eisenstein-supplied decoder beating the selected complex supplier needs total copy cost C <= 31 at some stage count (sup bracket 31.0635 at s=7, window h=7; with the minrank-10 window, C <= 29 at s <= 35), while every clean support alphabet costs exactly 40 (two sharp witnesses). The remaining upside of the route is the non-clean window C in [22,31]; the prize for any complex-only win is capped by the selected assembly bit side at kappa <= 0.001730427469823602 (+3.45%). No supplier is built and no kappa changes. Verifier: stdlib-only, exact, four negative controls, ~21s; registered replay passes. Co-authored-by: penguin-agent[bot] <penguin-agent[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR620's archived extension-ring screen leaves the asymmetric copy cost of the 40 Eisenstein E8 lines unresolved. This research note proves cost at least 22 Eisenstein pairing-rank units (44 rational units) for any finite number of scalar binary totals. A matching dual certificate also proves that 22 is the exact limit of every nonnegative weighted-clique certificate, including nonuniform weights on smaller cliques.
The actual decoder optimum remains in [22,40]. No cost-22 decoder, paid supplier or new κ is claimed. Under the inherited Dfc accounting, positive three-stage deficit would require integer copy cost 22–26; existence and all remaining implementation costs stay open.
The change adds only
research/eisenstein-clique-copy-bound/: the proof, exact certificate, standard-library replay, separate modular/Fraction cross-check, rejection tests, source pins, attribution and completed local claim. The finite domain is exhausted: 772 flats, 298,378 unordered flat pairs including empty supports, and 40,054 nonempty cliques. Closure extends the finite inequality to arbitrary source/reader subsets; rank subadditivity handles every finite number of totals. No solver-status or unproved symmetry premise is used in verification.Reproduce from the repository root (Python 3.10+, standard library):
Expected:
Additional checks:
The main receipt passes on Linux with Python 3.12.3 and optimized Python 3.11.15. The independent arithmetic implementation checks every primal inequality via modular rank lower bounds and all 241 dual costs with exact Fraction elimination. Three packaging tests pass, including relocated optimized replay, corrupted-certificate rejection and source-pin rejection with output preserved on failure. Selected-record integrity, package links, exported receipt equality and staged whitespace pass. Full repository/cold supplier suites, hosted CI and proof-assistant verification were not run or claimed; existing construction files are unchanged.
Exact base:
66849e1475c930fd7732b1a0067ffee7e1e95f60. Structural-decoder assignment seed 48. The selected #626/#543 κ remains51110230636731/31250000000000000. Physical interpretation inherits PR446's pairing-rank premise and the separate Dfc accounting; compiler, hosting, precision, tape and analytic obligations remain outside this finite result.Credit Joel Pulikkan / GamingPuzzled's PR620, using its archived head
419c7374c3bf5f2eee28f08b1e50c1d57934081c, for the geometry and prior screen. Credit Douglas R. Colkitt's PR703 (358383e2f1b0f292d4d6eb897c06fd8558a4f5e6) and Sagar Thakrar's PR738 (9671c5d72f3119ba26f3774f40aa7130c67bcf77) for the weighted-clique method on Hurwitz and Gaussian geometries. Their code is not imported. DreamingOfClouds and the earlier E8/community lineage retain their credit. Exact inspected-byte hashes and review-status distinctions are inSOURCES.json.No pinned coordination issue existed, so the claim and one result update are local. The final full metadata check covered 614 open PRs through #795; a subsequent check through #796 found only an unrelated prime-power audit using “Eisenstein.” PR767 and PR785 concern other geometries/models. Main remained at the recorded base.
Prepared by Jonathan Lam (@jonathanlam) with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance in mathematics, implementation, verification and documentation. Apache-2.0. No independent human review or full multiplication theorem proof is claimed.